Teams

As.Grantham40A

2026 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-19vs Am.Ray40AWon 31
L#1 DoublesAndrea Desonglo / Kimberly Lamm vs Kimberlei Gill / Louise Hutchinson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLisa Hawreluk vs Ginger Scanlon6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Foster / Christine Dukiet vs Donna Driscoll / Amie Ray6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVickie Gibbs / Susie Albion vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-12vs Ca.Grimes40ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesLisa Hawreluk / Susie Albion vs Clare Bonifant / Joanne Butler0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBelinda Berling vs Tyler Cunningham1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Grantham / Andrea Desonglo vs Emily Best / Melanie Gill7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Foster / Mary Ellen Wetzler-Behar vs Caroline Beaird / Elie Foy6-3, 6-3
2026-05-05vs Am.Koch40ALost 04
L#1 DoublesAndrea Desonglo / Lisa Hawreluk vs AMY KOCH / Stacey Winkelspecht2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAshley Grantham vs Jennifer Cotner7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly Lamm / Jennifer Roche vs Margaret Barham / Veda Bynum7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Ellen Wetzler-Behar / Patricia Zorko vs Katherine Jackson / Allison Dugan5-7, 2-6
2026-04-28vs Li.McDermott40ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesKaren Foster / Jennifer Roche vs Monica Gardner / Lisa McDermott5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBelinda Berling vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Desonglo / Ashley Grantham vs Krystal Glover / Kathryn Nani6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMary Ellen Wetzler-Behar / Christine Dukiet vs Beth Farrell / Aparna Vanguri2-5
2026-04-21vs Je.SagalSolomon40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Desonglo / Kimberly Lamm vs Marilyn Gordian / Michele Nowicki1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Roche vs Courtney McMickens6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Hawreluk / Stephanie Testa vs Kristen Deak / Gail Scoggin5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-14vs Ki.Lamb40AWon 31
L#1 DoublesJennifer Roche / Stephanie Testa vs Cassy Albertson / Jeannette Walker1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBelinda Berling vs Lisa Merritt6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Desonglo / Kimberly Lamm vs Lindsay Bass / Suzanne Braga2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Zorko / Mary Ellen Wetzler-Behar vs Elizabeth Pavese / Mindy Hamlin6-2, 6-1
2026-04-07vs Ch.Hochstrasser40AWon 21
L#1 DoublesKimberly Lamm / Stephanie Testa vs Diana Kennedy / Lee Berrios-Smothers1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Desonglo vs Lisa Austin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusie Albion / Mary Ellen Wetzler-Behar vs Marjorie Diaz / Mary Hellner6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-03-24vs An.Redmond40ALost 04
L#1 DoublesAndrea Desonglo / Stephanie Testa vs Cheri Kivisto / Heath Hilliker4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMary Ellen Wetzler-Behar vs Melissa Hill3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Grantham / Kimberly Lamm vs Anne Redmond / Ana Maria Allessi2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Dukiet / Patricia Zorko vs Susan Starnes / Allison Smith5-7, 1-6
2026-03-17vs As.Walker40ALost 04
L#1 DoublesJennifer Roche / Lisa Hawreluk vs Britt Tolliver / Tiffany Thompson0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBelinda Berling vs Stephanie Suski2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Foster / Patricia Zorko vs Theresa Critcher / Jennifer Guy0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Grantham / Susie Albion vs Catherine Bray / Myra Peterson0-6, 4-6
2026-03-03vs Hop.Pflaum40ALost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberly Lamm / Stephanie Testa vs Candice Kish / Melanie Waldron0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBelinda Berling vs Patty Wroblewski6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndrea Desonglo / Karen Foster vs Stephanie Black / Angela Coolidge7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Roche / Susie Albion vs Ryland Herring / Hope Pflaum7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings38 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Er.Hemminger40A10035518256
2As.Walker40A9134613204
3An.Redmond40A91271329293
4Je.Komes40A3.082281228275
5Kr.Gilreath40A3.082291129286
6Hop.Pflaum40A82281231303
7Sa.Kane40A82271331272
8Zo.Whitesell40A7024412165
9Cl.Duff40A7024415203
10Ca.Grimes40A73231736282
11Th.Roschel40A64231739337
12Ch.Hochstrasser40A64182250358
13Ju.Liddle40A5220818188
14Je.Wolborsky40A3.052181025241
15Ki.Meeker40A52151327221
16Li.McDermott40A55241637314
17Sh.Clarkson40A43161229254
18Ju.Clark40A43161231270
19Ju.Shuey40A43151332275
20Je.SagalSolomon40A46182254406
21La.McRee40A46142655375
22La.Daigle40A34131533267
23Ma.Basil40A34121634244
24Li.Howard40A34121634269
25As.Grantham40A37142656383
26We.Bargoil40A37152556395
27Am.Koch40A37132759406
28Br.Robinson40A37122859401
29Ka.Southern40A25121634273
30Me.Green40A25111738281
31Ch.Mccorquodale40A2591940286
32Mo.Garrell40A28152559416
33Ke.Hurter40A28112961406
34Ki.Lamb40A19112960402
35Ka.Landi40A19112964439
36An.Pershke40A0742450310
37Ki.Roberts40A0732551321
38Am.Ray40A010103066428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Patricia Zorko
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Andrea Desonglo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Jennifer Roche
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
2.60
Susie Albion
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Lisa Hawreluk
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.59
Mary Ellen Wetzler-Behar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.56
Stephanie Testa
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.54
Kimberly Lamm
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.49
Ashley Grantham
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.45
Christine Dukiet
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Belinda Berling
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Vickie Gibbs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vickie Gibbs + Ashley Grantham1445% gamesnot enough data
Vickie Gibbs + Belinda Berling224 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Desonglo + Kimberly Lamm123 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Desonglo + Ashley Grantham213 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Lamm + Ashley Grantham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Patricia Zorko
40W–43L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Andrea Desonglo
132W–93L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Jennifer Roche
3W–10L career · 10 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Susie Albion
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.60
Lisa Hawreluk
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
Mary Ellen Wetzler-Behar
4W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Stephanie Testa
1W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Kimberly Lamm
86W–102L career · 7 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Ashley Grantham
36W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
3
Christine Dukiet
80W–150L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
2.5
Belinda Berling
37W–74L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Vickie Gibbs
55W–75L career · 1 line in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.