Teams

STL/Basham/40&Over4.5W

2021 Adult 40 & Over · Women 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-03vs Peterson/HuchetWon 21
L#1 DoublesSara Gregerson / Antoinette Kovar vs Ellie Huff / Erica Peterson4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Deck vs Nikki Nadreau6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Ward / Lisa Lamb vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-20vs SheltonWon 21
L#1 DoublesSynthia Burgess / Sherry Taylor vs Guzel Bilyalova / Jennifer Melichar3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJulie Deck vs Dana Metzger6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSara Runge / Mary Bazan vs Trish Skaer / Angela Muzzarelli6-1, 6-3
2021-07-13vs Peterson/HuchetWon 21
W#1 DoublesLorrie Crossett / Antoinette Kovar vs Ellie Huff / Carrie Mcdaniel7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCarrie Lutterman vs Erin Rubinelli3-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Ward / Sherry Taylor vs Heather Epperly / Dani Schlottman6-4, 7-6
2021-06-29vs SheltonWon 31
L#1 DoublesLorrie Crossett / Antoinette Kovar vs Guzel Bilyalova / Jennifer Melichar5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Deck vs Christina Pupillo6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSara Runge / Mary Bazan vs Trish Skaer / Angela Muzzarelli7-5, 5-3
W#3 DoublesTherese Basham / Lisa Lamb vs Mimi Shelton / Anne Dressel Sutter5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-22vs Peterson/HuchetLost 04
L#1 DoublesAntoinette Kovar / Paula Douglass vs Ellie Huff / Nikki Nadreau4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCarrie Lutterman vs Victoria Zielinski3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSherry Taylor / Elizabeth Ward vs Carrie Mcdaniel / Laurie Franz2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Lamb / Synthia Burgess vs Severine Huchet / Heather Epperly2-6, 1-6
2021-06-08vs SheltonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTherese Basham / Synthia Burgess vs Guzel Bilyalova / Jennifer Melichar6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Deck vs Christina Pupillo6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSara Runge / Paula Douglass vs Trish Skaer / Angela Muzzarelli3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSara Gregerson / Sarah Reed vs Betty Feder / Grace Chi6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Basham/40&Over4.5W51141022176
2Peterson/Huchet4216817188
3Shelton0661838260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Sara Runge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Lorrie Crossett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Therese Basham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Sherry Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Julie Deck
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.98
Paula Douglass
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Antoinette Kovar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
Sara Gregerson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Lisa Lamb
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Carrie Lutterman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Elizabeth Ward
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
Mary Bazan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Reed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Douglass + Sarah Reed7355% games+9.2% vs expected
Sherry Taylor + Lorrie Crossett5172% games+8.8% vs expected
Sara Runge + Mary Bazan11658% games+4.6% vs expected
Paula Douglass + Mary Bazan5351% games+3.7% vs expected
Lorrie Crossett + Antoinette Kovar281158% games+0.4% vs expected
Therese Basham + Sara Runge61050% games+0.4% vs expected
Sherry Taylor + Julie Deck7849% games+0.3% vs expected
Paula Douglass + Sherry Taylor1940% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sara Runge
80W–72L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.30
Lorrie Crossett
71W–31L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Therese Basham
115W–136L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
Sherry Taylor
50W–72L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
4.15
Julie Deck
63W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
4.13
Paula Douglass
37W–69L career · 2 lines in 2021
57%43%<1%
3.98
4.5
Antoinette Kovar
80W–69L career · 4 lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
3.94
Sara Gregerson
53W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
87%13%<1%
3.85
Lisa Lamb
52W–67L career · 3 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.58
Carrie Lutterman
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Elizabeth Ward
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Bazan
32W–32L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Reed
31W–30L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.