Teams

CV-Rancho Las Palmas/Schwalbe

2022 CV Fall Combo Doubles · CV Women 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-28vs CV-Sun City PD/L Gagnon & KimLost 02
L#2 DoublesJulee Moore / Rebecca Ringer vs Anne Dickinson / Zava Rosen3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Butters / Jennifer Charron vs Ann Oswald / Lesley Gagnon3-6, 1-6
2022-12-21vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/S YoungLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulee Moore / Rebecca Ringer vs Lisa Hayes / Suzanne Young2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-12-07vs CV-Sun City PD/L Gagnon & KimLost 02
L#2 DoublesKathy Schwalbe / Julee Moore vs Patricia Taylor / Heidi Kelly4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Nelson / Margaret Clancy vs Suzette Willetts / Catherine Petitti0-6, 2-6
2022-11-30vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/S YoungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarol Cornell / Jennifer Charron vs Melanie Ditton / Paula Buononato4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEllen Boyer / Rebecca Ringer vs Lisa Hayes / Stacie Hogan6-1, 6-1
2022-11-09vs CV-Sun City PD/L Gagnon & KimLost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Boyer / Jennifer Charron vs Ann Oswald / Catherine Lind1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Schwalbe / Julee Moore vs Patricia Taylor / Heidi Kelly0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Butters / Margaret Clancy vs Anne Dickinson / Ann White0-6, 1-6
2022-11-02vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/S YoungLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Butters / Jennifer Charron vs Kristal Wilson / Hilary Quinn1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Boyer / Margaret Clancy vs Faith Zelenko / Heather Black0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Schwalbe / Julee Moore vs Suzanne Young / Lisa Hayes6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Rebecca Ringer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Becky Jones
published 3.5
3.27
Jennifer Charron
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Carol Cornell
published 3.5
3.22
Lori Tanking
published
3.05
Julee Moore
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Margaret Clancy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Ellen Boyer
published 3
Kathy Schwalbe
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rebecca Ringer
63W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Becky Jones
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Jennifer Charron
92W–104L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carol Cornell
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Tanking
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Julee Moore
44W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Margaret Clancy
69W–90L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Ellen Boyer
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Kathy Schwalbe
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.