Teams

WOCC Fuller

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-17vs ACAC CarmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesNiki Smith / Maya Wilder vs Liesl Delisio / Jeanine Wisor6-3, 6-2
2022-06-14vs Kings Charter PurmasirWon 20
W#1 SinglesLaura Granger vs Katherine Lawrence6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMaya Wilder / Niki Smith vs Grace Fell / Melissa Allen6-1, 6-3
2022-06-09vs HCC CaldwellWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Granger / Maya Wilder vs Lynn Holly / Kristy Bauer6-3, 6-1
2022-06-07vs KRA HaukSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSharon Fuller / Maya Wilder vs Emily Edens / Katie Gerecke6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLaura Granger vs Shelley Daughtrey6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-06vs CCV AverySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaya Wilder / Sharan Wilder vs Caroline Harding / Courtney Harper5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesLaura Granger vs Ashley Millen6-1, 6-1
2022-06-02vs RCC SamuelsLost 02
L#1 DoublesLee Turlington / Anne Elles vs Christine Finnegan / Julie Stivers5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Granger vs Samantha Finnegan2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-31vs ACAC RiddleWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharan Wilder / Anne Elles vs Andrea Schuetzinger / Angela Miller0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaura Granger vs Grace Kim6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNiki Smith / Maya Wilder vs Karen Zachary / Robin Petrine6-2, 6-3
2022-05-20vs Burkwood RowWon 20
W#1 SinglesLaura Granger vs Lindsey O'Kane3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnne Elles vs Ann Maitland-Lewis6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jessica Morton
published
3.92
Laura Granger
usually #1 Singles 62%, also #1 Doubles 15% · published 4.5
3.85
Anne Elles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.73
Sharon Fuller
published
3.65
Maya Wilder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Niki Smith
published
3.48
Julia Calamita
published
3.44
Laurie Schaaf
published
Lee Turlington
published
Sharan Wilder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Granger + Anne Elles4550% gamesnot enough data
Maya Wilder + Anne Elles5157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Morton
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
4.5
Laura Granger
131W–99L career · 13 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Anne Elles
147W–130L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Sharon Fuller
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Maya Wilder
64W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Niki Smith
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
Julia Calamita
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.48
Laurie Schaaf
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
Lee Turlington
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharan Wilder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.