Teams

Wild Blue Spring Chicks

2026 Sarasota Adult 18 & Over Spring Weekend · 4.0 W Saturday

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-20vs TLC Sarasota All StarsWon 31
W#1 DoublesSarah Anne Mcdonald / Svetlana Janglin vs Abigail Stephens / Jacqueline Borden6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrea Nathan vs Courtney Rosenthal3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSheila Engert / Jennifer Butcher vs Coquina Homer / Jennifer Stroble6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTambra Ford / Donna Dubinsky vs Laura Severson / Carrie Pillay6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-13vs TPC TennisSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTambra Ford / Sheila Engert vs Erin Liddy - (DQ)* / Colleen Shoemaker3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs Kimberly Gacso3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSue Silberbusch / Svetlana Janglin vs Melissa Stevens / Lisa Temple6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Nicole Thompson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-06vs River Strand RallycatsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSheila Engert / Tambra Ford vs Annmarie Curle / Penny Franklin7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLinda Radovich vs Susanne Booth6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMartina Kralickova / Kathy Rain vs Kristen Keyser / Nancy Finman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCathy Maler / Sue Silberbusch vs Kara Beene / Chris Poole6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-30vs LWR EspositoWon 40
W#1 DoublesSheila Engert / Cathy Maler vs Peggy Crotty / Nia Esposito6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs Kim Eck6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Linda Radovich vs Natalie Bloch / Karen Spiegel7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSarah Anne Mcdonald / Svetlana Janglin vs Barbara Cogen / Karen Collins6-1, 6-3
2026-05-09vs TLC Sarasota All StarsWon 31
L#1 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Nanelle Rosales vs Mary Gill / Mari-Ann Kucharek2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs Jennifer Stroble6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSheila Engert / Cathy Maler vs Cindy Rosenberg / Courtney Rosenthal6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Nancy Moran vs Coquina Homer / Karen Dale6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-02vs LWR EspositoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSarah Anne Mcdonald / Nicole Thompson vs Megan McAloon / Lauren Larkin6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs Karen Patchell6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTambra Ford / Sheila Engert vs Natalie Bloch / Heidi Cox6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Linda Radovich vs Karen Nicholson / Karen Collins6-3, 7-5
2026-04-25vs River Strand RallycatsWon 31
W#1 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Nanelle Rosales vs Kim Reiser / Kristen Weston6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrea Nathan vs Susanne Booth3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSue Silberbusch / Hillary Nielsen vs Bernadette King / Judi Wilson6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Kathy Rain vs Chris Poole / Kara Beene3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-18vs TPC TennisLost 13
L#1 DoublesNanelle Rosales / Hillary Nielsen vs Jaylene Adamczyk / Melissa Stevens7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndrea Nathan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKathryn Paige Ciano / Martina Kralickova vs Lisa Temple / Cheryl Lyn2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Nancy Moran vs Marsha Timm / Roberta Smith3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Kathryn Paige Ciano
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.93
Jennifer Butcher
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.93
Sarah Anne Mcdonald
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Linda Radovich
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Cathy Maler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Sheila Engert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Tambra Ford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Andrea Nathan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.80
Nicole Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Nanelle Rosales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Sue Silberbusch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Svetlana Janglin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Hillary Nielsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Martina Kralickova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Kathy Rain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Donna Dubinsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Celia Pena
published 4
3.58
Nancy Moran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheila Engert + Cathy Maler8159% games+5.5% vs expected
Donna Dubinsky + Kathy Rain232650% games+2.9% vs expected
Tambra Ford + Kathy Rain3348% games+1.5% vs expected
Svetlana Janglin + Martina Kralickova8456% games−0.5% vs expected
Jennifer Butcher + Linda Radovich2454% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Butcher + Sheila Engert3254% gamesnot enough data
Tambra Ford + Sheila Engert3256% gamesnot enough data
Svetlana Janglin + Kathy Rain5065% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kathryn Paige Ciano
103W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.04
Jennifer Butcher
20W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.93
Sarah Anne Mcdonald
63W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Linda Radovich
85W–82L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Cathy Maler
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
Sheila Engert
18W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Tambra Ford
177W–127L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Andrea Nathan
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
Nicole Thompson
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Nanelle Rosales
84W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Sue Silberbusch
28W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Svetlana Janglin
98W–111L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Hillary Nielsen
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Martina Kralickova
91W–63L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kathy Rain
91W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Donna Dubinsky
62W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Celia Pena
68W–59L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.61
Nancy Moran
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.