Teams

300 Club Redding

2026 Alachua Adult 40 & Over Spring · 2.5 W Thur

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-13vs Alachua/WilsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Smith / Krista Smith vs Karyn Governale / Charlene Krueger2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMajken Hoh / Betsy Yankopolus vs Blakely Porter / Trina Harris3-6, 2-6
2026-06-09vs Alachua/WilsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Smith / Krista Smith vs Marly Wilson / Trina Harris1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Redding vs Blakely Porter6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMegan Mcvay / Betsy Yankopolus vs Kristine van Vorst / Charlene Krueger1-6, 2-6
2026-05-22vs Alachua/WilsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Smith / Julie Redding vs Karyn Governale / Raquel Navarro4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKrista Smith / Denise Krigbaum vs Blakely Porter / Charlene Krueger6-7, 1-6
2026-05-18vs Alachua/WilsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Smith / Majken Hoh vs Trina Harris / Charlene Krueger1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDenise Krigbaum vs Kristine van Vorst5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKrista Smith / Megan Mcvay vs Raquel Navarro / Marly Wilson7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-29vs Alachua/WilsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Redding / Denise Krigbaum vs Karyn Governale / Trina Harris2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKrista Smith / Betsy Yankopolus vs Marly Wilson / Blakely Porter3-6, 1-6
2026-04-18vs Alachua/WilsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Redding / Krista Smith vs Trina Harris / Kristine van Vorst3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Mcvay / Betsy Yankopolus vs Raquel Navarro / Blakely Porter6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Alachua/WilsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Redding / Krista Smith vs Marly Wilson / Karyn Governale5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMegan Mcvay vs Blakely Porter7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKim Smith / Denise Krigbaum vs Raquel Navarro / Trina Harris2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 W Thur have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
Julie Redding
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.14
Majken Hoh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.12
Megan Mcvay
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.12
Denise Krigbaum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.06
Betsy Yankopolus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.05
Krista Smith
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Julie Redding
40W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
Majken Hoh
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Megan Mcvay
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Denise Krigbaum
3W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Betsy Yankopolus
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Krista Smith
3W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.