Teams

SOL: Chip 'n Charge: Murray

2026 SCT Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0 55 & Over Men - 1

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesTimothy Bepler / Pete Cassidy vs Anthony DiPippa / Fernando Zapotoczny3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJorge Linero / Sam Manessis vs Howard Bruck / David Friedman4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJason Perez / Daniel Tepper vs James Pratt-Heaney / Jeffrey Nelson6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesJorge Linero / Alex Bowie vs Anthony DiPippa / Fernando Zapotoczny0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJason Perez / Daniel Tepper vs EIKI MERA / David Miles Friedman6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesJorge Linero / Jason Perez vs Brian McCauley / John Rose6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSam Manessis / Philip Murray vs Brian Bardinelli / David Taylor2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Luttrell / Lou Rawden vs Matthew Berger / Robert Ray2-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesPete Cassidy / Joseph Blazovic vs Matthew Berger / Robert Ray0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChris Corrado / Scott Falconer vs Andrew Leggio / Dennis DiPinto2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#1 DoublesPete Cassidy / Jason Perez vs Matthew Berger / Alan Zinser6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Murray / Lou Rawden vs David Hill / Robert Ray2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBruno Cilio / Scott Falconer vs Brian Bardinelli / Steve Rosa3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesPete Cassidy / Scott Falconer vs Anthony DiPippa / Fernando Zapotoczny1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJason Perez / Gil Feder vs David Miles Friedman / EIKI MERA4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChris Corrado / James Elliot vs Howard Bruck / David Friedman1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Men - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SOL: Chip 'n Charge: Murray0631530190
2MRC: Senior Service:Berger/McCauley0714716171
3WRC: Full Metal Racquets: Zapotoczny/Fontana0713818160

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Justo Reyes
published
3.53
James Elliot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Jason Perez
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.39
Pete Cassidy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Sam Manessis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Jorge Linero
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Scott Falconer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Robert Luttrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Joseph Blazovic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Timothy Bepler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Chris Corrado
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Daniel Tepper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Charles Knirsch
published 3.5
3.07
Lou Rawden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Alex Bowie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Bruno Cilio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Gil Feder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Philip Murray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pete Cassidy + Jorge Linero10560% games+12.6% vs expected
Gil Feder + Jorge Linero12658% games+7.1% vs expected
Joseph Blazovic + Jason Perez5162% games+5.7% vs expected
Pete Cassidy + Joseph Blazovic4550% games+5.0% vs expected
Philip Murray + Gil Feder9557% games+4.0% vs expected
Timothy Bepler + Pete Cassidy422055% games+3.8% vs expected
Chris Corrado + Alex Bowie4253% games+1.3% vs expected
Gil Feder + Sam Manessis3553% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justo Reyes
53W–42L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
James Elliot
165W–89L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Jason Perez
67W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Pete Cassidy
97W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Sam Manessis
75W–92L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jorge Linero
237W–207L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Scott Falconer
46W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Robert Luttrell
23W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Joseph Blazovic
54W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Timothy Bepler
60W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Chris Corrado
225W–216L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Daniel Tepper
11W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Charles Knirsch
149W–165L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.14
Lou Rawden
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Alex Bowie
29W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Bruno Cilio
69W–85L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Gil Feder
60W–45L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Philip Murray
97W–115L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.