Teams

Tran - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-02-13vs Escambia/O'Neill/40&Over6.0MXDWon 10
W#3 DoublesLiz Payne / Victor Agadzi vs Cindy Myer / Eric Rasmussen6-3, 6-3
2024-02-06vs Link - RS HardWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaye Whittenberger / Jim Smith vs Allison McCrory / Jody Link6-2, 6-0
2024-01-30vs Haigler - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Smith / Liz Payne vs Carl Wernicke / Klara Szalai6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-01-15vs Ross - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesJim Smith / Kaye Whittenberger vs Jonathan Llanera / Michelle Patterson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVictor Agadzi / Liz Payne vs Jill Olinick / Lou Boudreaux6-4, 6-3
2024-01-02vs Quinn - SHLSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracy Schmidt / Liz Payne vs FRANK LOPRESTI / Alisha Krecidlo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJim Smith / Kaye Whittenberger vs Joe Patroni / Stacey Hamilton6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
John Whittenberger
published
3.02
Kaye Whittenberger
published
2.98
Theresa Smith
published
2.92
Victor Agadzi
published
2.91
Liz Payne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Judy Harrington
published
2.88
Tracy Schmidt
published
2.72
Jim Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.62
Candy Zuleger
published 3
2.62
Jaymes Tran
published
Andrew Sowell
published 2.5
Julie Sowell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Smith + Liz Payne5263% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Whittenberger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Kaye Whittenberger
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Theresa Smith
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Victor Agadzi
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Liz Payne
139W–105L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Judy Harrington
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Tracy Schmidt
16W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Jim Smith
83W–69L career · 8 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Candy Zuleger
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
Jaymes Tran
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
2.5
Andrew Sowell
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Sowell
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.