Teams

RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-15vs ROSEVILLE LIFE TIME 40AM4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesBilly Krimmel / David Sebba vs Jeff Bolton / Matt Hillman5-7, 3-6
2025-01-15vs GOLD RIVER RC 40AM4.0BWon 10
W#1 DoublesRob Lessler / David Sebba vs Todd Humphrey / Nandakumar Natarajan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
David Sebba
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 4.5
3.90
Rahul Dhillon
published
3.89
Billy Krimmel
published 4
3.83
Daniel Gong
published 4
3.83
Patrick Dorais
published
3.81
Ryan Renteria
published
3.78
Rob Lessler
published
3.78
Andy Farris
published 4
3.75
MacArio Ramiscal
published
3.74
Moises Lopez
published
3.73
Richard Hitchcock
published
3.49
Rick Ray
published
3.40
Barrington Henry
published 3.5
3.20
Rommel Llanes
published
Jimmy Culleton
published
Richard Le
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Renteria + Rob Lessler3259% games−1.7% vs expected
Patrick Dorais + Ryan Renteria4149% games−3.5% vs expected
Patrick Dorais + Andy Farris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Sebba
85W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Rahul Dhillon
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Billy Krimmel
11W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Daniel Gong
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Patrick Dorais
28W–25L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Ryan Renteria
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Rob Lessler
30W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Andy Farris
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
MacArio Ramiscal
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Moises Lopez
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Richard Hitchcock
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Rick Ray
15W–25L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Barrington Henry
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Rommel Llanes
26W–18L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Jimmy Culleton
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Le
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.