Teams

MC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-13vs LTC-D GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesKirsten Sharer / Patty Archuleta vs Jill McKeon / Barbara Nevins0-6, 5-7
2024-06-06vs NJ NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoy EVANS / Patty Archuleta vs Gail Berkery / Barbara Westfall6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBetty Evans / Sara Quackenbush vs Kathleen Rimlinger / Kathleen Harvey3-6, 2-6
2024-05-30vs MVCC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesKirsten Sharer / Becky Lowery vs Julie Levey / Kim Hassinger7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-23vs MC BLUEWon 20
W#2 DoublesLuann Mcclure / Kirsten Sharer vs Sharlene Funk / Kat Holm6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBetty Evans / Sara Quackenbush vs Karen Bent / Kelly Sengenberger6-3, 6-2
2024-05-16vs NJ ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesPatty Archuleta / Joy EVANS vs Pamela Johnstone / Kathleen Gerbino0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBetty Evans / Karen Schneider vs Jessica Peterson / Holly McClure4-6, 1-6
2024-05-09vs LTC-D GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoy EVANS / Patty Archuleta vs Mary Johanson / Judith McKinney6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2024-05-02vs NJ NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesKirsten Sharer / Becky Lowery vs Jo Johnson / Helen Peterman6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPatty Archuleta / Luann Mcclure vs Janet Colvin / Janie Trevor4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Schneider / Betty Evans vs Carol Tye Rose / Kathleen Harvey7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Patty Archuleta
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Becky Lowery
published 3
2.69
Kirsten Sharer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Betty Evans
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.05
Barbara Coria
published 2.5
Joy EVANS
published
Lavada Harmon
published
Luann Mcclure
published
Sara Quackenbush
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirsten Sharer + Patty Archuleta4448% games+1.8% vs expected
Joy EVANS + Patty Archuleta3451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Patty Archuleta
75W–149L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Becky Lowery
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Kirsten Sharer
48W–85L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Betty Evans
31W–82L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Barbara Coria
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Joy EVANS
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lavada Harmon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Luann Mcclure
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara Quackenbush
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.