Teams

HCC BLUE

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-27vs CROWN PINKLost 02
L#1 DoublesJena McCrann / Michele Gieg vs Amy Daniel / Stephanie Hayes4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChapin Benway vs Colleen Barill2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-24vs GSCC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesBecky Rockwell / Michele Gieg vs Anne Swanson / Kimberly Hammond Pattillo4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNora Dispense / Donna Merkel vs Andie Hall / Barb Hovde-Brown2-6, 2-6
2025-09-13vs SMGLR REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJamie Pitt Miller / Lonetia Gerken vs Betsy Black / Jodi Jacobson6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChapin Benway vs Robin Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Chipman / Michele Gieg vs Mardell Burkholder / Samantha Pearl6-1, 6-0
2025-08-27vs GSCC PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesBecky Rockwell / Mary Ellen Wanty vs Kelly Zevin / Emelie Piper6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNora Dispense / Donna Merkel vs Kate Leibinger / Martha Schanfarber7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-20vs RVR REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesBecky Rockwell / Mary Ellen Wanty vs Carrie Kellman / Brooke Stott6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDonna Merkel vs Yoko Smith Rhodes0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Gieg / Lonetia Gerken vs Michelle Bevington / Karen Fullerton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CROWN PINK4213513135
2BASALT PURPLE236919136
3SMGLR RED2471124174
4GSCC PURPLE2461226187
5HCC BLUE146918122

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Becky Rockwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chapin Benway
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.34
Donna Merkel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Jamie Pitt Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jena McCrann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lonetia Gerken
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Ellen Wanty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michele Gieg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nora Dispense
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Chipman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Becky Rockwell
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chapin Benway
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Donna Merkel
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.34
Jamie Pitt Miller
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jena McCrann
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lonetia Gerken
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Ellen Wanty
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Gieg
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nora Dispense
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Chipman
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.