Teams

Chestnut Oaks Mercurio 3.5

2025 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend 3.5 Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.31 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-13vs ACAC - Cipolla 3.5Lost 14
L#1 DoublesJay Harter / STEVEN ROBERTS vs Thomas Wilson / Matt Pepple5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBert Foreman vs Ryland Dennis6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSam Cohen / Rahul Khisti vs Anthony Forgey / Irvin Banks5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Mercurio / Anil Naidu vs Stephen Chandler / Joseph Cipolla3-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesJohn Mulligan / John Ley vs Dave Bucheit / Anant Singh6-4, 6-3
2025-07-06vs Westwood MullahyLost 23
W#1 DoublesSam Cohen / Jay Harter vs Gardner Mundy / Sacha Shaygan7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCreighton Anders vs Brian Holder6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGene Fishel / Robert Mercurio vs Michael Flynn / Christopher Carlin2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnil Naidu / John Ley vs Robert Teele / Brad Rodgers0-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesSam Berg / Gary Hinson vs Lonnie Lemco / Mark Wickersham6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-29vs Willow Oaks BresslerLost 14
L#1 DoublesAnthony Cargiulo / Creighton Anders vs Terence Blackwood / Shawn Harwood4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSTEVEN ROBERTS vs Matt Curtis6-4, 6-6
L#2 DoublesJay Harter / Daryl Jones vs Jeff Moehling / Michael Chapman2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSam Berg / Gary Hinson vs Ivan Mullinax / Danny MacNelly3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesAnil Naidu / Gene Fishel vs Bill Dagostino / Trent McFadden5-7, 1-6
2025-06-14vs Woodlake McCoy 3.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesPeter Olson / Christopher Parrack vs Peter Schneeberger / Michael Cousineau3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnthony Cargiulo / Bert Foreman vs Ron Birnbaum / Joe Fowler1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Mulligan / Nicholas Kaplan vs Dave McCoy / Gene Zaretski2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesRobert Mercurio / Gary Hinson vs Rafael Garrido / Chris Rabender7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
STEVEN ROBERTS
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Creighton Anders
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
John Mulligan
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Christopher Parrack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Anthony Cargiulo
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Bert Foreman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Sam Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Rahul Khisti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Jay Harter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Gary Hinson
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Sam Berg
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
John Ley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.91
Nicholas Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Anil Naidu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Daryl Jones
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Robert Mercurio
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 14% · published
2.81
Gene Fishel
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Peter Olson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Berg + John Ley314 matchesnot enough data
John Mulligan + Daryl Jones213 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Cargiulo + Sam Cohen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

STEVEN ROBERTS
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Creighton Anders
30W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
John Mulligan
23W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Christopher Parrack
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Anthony Cargiulo
25W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bert Foreman
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Sam Cohen
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Rahul Khisti
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Jay Harter
6W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Gary Hinson
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Sam Berg
29W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
John Ley
16W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Nicholas Kaplan
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Anil Naidu
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Daryl Jones
19W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.90
Robert Mercurio
28W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Gene Fishel
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Peter Olson
24W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.