Teams

Jackson Hole Community

2022 WY Tri-Level · Jackson Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WYOMING

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-17vs PinesLost 12
L#1 DoublesHyla Chatham / Jenny May vs Judith Kaelber / Laura Cuddie0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMimi Freymann / Libby Erker vs Lenore Jonasson / Nan Mettam2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Mei / Kelly Matthews vs Cathleen French / Megan Jenkins6-2, 6-3
2022-08-10vs PinesLost 03
L#1 DoublesHyla Chatham / Jenny May vs Heather Silverman / Hannah Bruch1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMimi Freymann / Diane McGee vs Linda Merigliano / Cheri Witz2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Mei / Eliza Kimmel vs Kelly Milligan / Megan Jenkins0-6, 0-6
2022-08-03vs PinesLost 12
L#1 DoublesHyla Chatham / Jenny May vs Laura Cuddie / Hannah Bruch3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiane McGee / Libby Erker vs Cheri Witz / Lenore Jonasson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEliza Kimmel / Jennifer Mei vs Cathleen French / Megan Jenkins6-3, 6-4
2022-07-27vs PinesLost 12
W#1 DoublesHyla Chatham / Jenny May vs Judith Kaelber / Hannah Bruch5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargaret Creel / Jennifer Mei vs Linda Merigliano / Nan Mettam1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Matthews / Eliza Kimmel vs Miranda Hoover / Cathleen French4-6, 1-6
2022-07-20vs PinesLost 03
L#1 DoublesHyla Chatham / Jenny May vs Judith Kaelber / Heather Silverman6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Creel / Libby Erker vs Linda Merigliano / Cheri Witz1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Mei / Kelly Matthews vs Miranda Hoover / Kelly Milligan3-6, 1-6
2022-07-18vs PinesLost 12
L#1 DoublesHyla Chatham / Jenny May vs Judith Kaelber / Laura Cuddie4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMimi Freymann / Diane McGee vs Linda Merigliano / Nan Mettam3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Matthews / Jennifer Mei vs Kelly Milligan / Miranda Hoover6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Jackson Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Jenny May
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Jennifer Mei
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Mimi Freymann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Diane McGee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eliza Kimmel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hyla Chatham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Libby Erker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Creel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny May + Hyla Chatham1534% games+2.8% vs expected
Mimi Freymann + Jennifer Mei3448% games−22.3% vs expected
Diane McGee + Mimi Freymann3351% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Mei + Kelly Matthews213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenny May
26W–15L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Jennifer Mei
14W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Mimi Freymann
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Diane McGee
7W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Eliza Kimmel
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Hyla Chatham
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Matthews
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Libby Erker
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret Creel
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.