Teams

18 & Over Women 4.0 - CTH Giovanni Ortiz

Adult 18 & Over 2022 · 2022 18 & Over Women 4.0-Flight 2

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-03-27vs 18 & Over Women 4.0 -GORILLASSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSylnes Centeno / Jilmarie Casas vs Stephanie Morales / Paola Carde4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrendalis Borrero / Amanda Suarez vs Ivelisse Colon / Michelle Mont Bianchi6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrendalis Borrero / Mariangelis Plumey-Pabon - (DQ)* vs Blanca Montalvo / Ana Rita Ortiz6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAriana Landrau / Sylnes Centeno vs Rebeca Lopez / Blanca Montalvo1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBrendalis Borrero / Mariangelis Plumey-Pabon - (DQ)* vs Kenia Algarin / Maria Grafals6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMariana Munoz / Sylnes Centeno vs Maria del Mar Figueroa / Karla Letona4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 18 & Over Women 4.0-Flight 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
3.98
Sylnes Centeno
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.97
Ariana Landrau
published 4.5
3.91
RUTH RAMOS
published
3.89
Amanda Suarez
published 4
3.78
Brendalis Borrero
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
Carla Colon
published 4
3.72
Rita Mas
published
Jilmarie Casas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Desiree Ortiz-Santiago + Carla Colon5064% games+9.6% vs expected
Sylnes Centeno + Brendalis Borrero314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Suarez + Desiree Ortiz-Santiago123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Desiree Ortiz-Santiago
21W–10L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Sylnes Centeno
101W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.98
4.5
Ariana Landrau
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
RUTH RAMOS
45W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Amanda Suarez
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Brendalis Borrero
175W–93L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Carla Colon
18W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rita Mas
36W–19L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Janitza Morales Lopez
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jilmarie Casas
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Keisy Ann Nicole Rivera Casiano
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.