Teams

CTL18/Eifert/WRC

Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo Women - 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-29vs CTL18/Price/CTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesCory Corp / Erin Johnson vs Natasha Ferguson Dennison / LaToya Reese6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKelly Eifert vs Jessica Price6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-11-15vs CTL18/GALE/WLDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Eifert / Renee Connolly vs Grace Ouellet / Cathleen Tenero6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Garin / Cory Corp vs Alison Herro / Emma Jenkins6-2, 6-0
2023-10-25vs CTL18/Thurston/CSPLost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Johnson / Dorothy Collins vs Rhonda Meisner / Lori Triplett7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-29vs CTL18/Price/CTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Eifert / Janet Sullivan vs Samantha Yager / Natasha Ferguson Dennison6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMary Melissa Roland vs Jenny Maxwell1-6, 2-6
2023-03-01vs CTL18/Thurston/CSPSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Eifert / Janet Sullivan vs Deyaska Sweatman / Angela Russell6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRachel Frick / Mary Melissa Roland vs Perrinne Wooten / Amy Malcom2-6, 1-6
2023-02-22vs CTL18/GALE/WLDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCory Corp / Debra Horlback vs Andrea Gale / Debbie Russell4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Sullivan / Dorothy Collins vs Alison Herro / Emilie Brown6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women - 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Janet Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Carla Young
published 3
2.55
Cory Corp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.20
Kelly Eifert
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.89
Dorothy Collins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Mary Melissa Roland
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Eifert + Dorothy Collins0536% games−3.8% vs expected
Kelly Eifert + Cory Corp224 matchesnot enough data
Cory Corp + Dorothy Collins224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Eifert + Janet Sullivan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Sullivan
84W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Carla Young
45W–42L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Cory Corp
23W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Kelly Eifert
23W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Dorothy Collins
5W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Mary Melissa Roland
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.