Teams

SIMS:Kahn

2021 NCT Adult 55 & Over Men · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-05-22vs MRC:Court Jesters:MayoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJeremy Greshin / Scott Kolb vs Brian Bardinelli / Greg Brenner6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMark Lescher / Sean Glasgow vs Sean Smith / Robert Monyak4-6, 3-6
2021-04-24vs FV:ParekhLost 02
L#1 DoublesSean Glasgow / Scott Mason vs Andrew Miller / Scott Snow2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesScott Kolb / Mark Lescher vs Carlos Badiola / James Burda2-6, 5-7
2021-03-27vs FV:ParekhWon 21
L#1 DoublesLowell Kahn / Scott Mason vs Jim Tillow / James Burda1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Franklin / Dilip Rangnekar vs David Parekh / James Carter6-2, 3-6, 4-2
W#3 DoublesScott Kolb / Jeremy Greshin vs Frederic de Baeck / Charles Wong6-2, 3-6, 6-3
2021-03-13vs FV:ParekhLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteve Franklin / Dilip Rangnekar vs James Burda / Jim Tillow2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSean Glasgow / Mark Lescher vs James Carter / Frederic de Baeck4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FV:Parekh4211715156
2SIMS:Kahn134818131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jeremy Greshin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Steve Franklin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Dilip Rangnekar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
2.98
Mark Lescher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Kolb
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Mason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Franklin + Dilip Rangnekar6449% games−11.6% vs expected
Steve Franklin + Jeremy Greshin314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Greshin
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Steve Franklin
43W–27L career · 2 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Dilip Rangnekar
38W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.44
Mark Lescher
13W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.98
Scott Kolb
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Mason
29W–30L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.