Teams

Waguespack/40/3.5/WD/BREC

2024 BR Adult 40 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 BR (40&O) Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 BR (40&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Lisa Marie Raiford
published
3.42
Hollie Easterling
published
3.37
Julie Purdy
published
3.29
Renee Simoneaux
published
3.26
Leah Jenkins
published
Catherine Fairchild
published 3.5
Cindy Pixley
published 3.5
3.20
Cindy Kelley
published 3.5
3.19
Megan Beecham
published
3.13
Shona McCoy
published
3.08
Kyle Barker
published
3.03
Elizabeth Densmore
published
2.84
Alena Prejean
published 3
Jennifer Tolbert
published
Julienne Waguespack
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shona McCoy + Megan Beecham033 matchesnot enough data
Renee Simoneaux + Kyle Barker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Marie Raiford
28W–64L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Hollie Easterling
39W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Julie Purdy
19W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Renee Simoneaux
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Leah Jenkins
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Catherine Fairchild
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Pixley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Kelley
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Megan Beecham
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Shona McCoy
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Kyle Barker
7W–25L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Elizabeth Densmore
7W–21L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Alena Prejean
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Jennifer Tolbert
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julienne Waguespack
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.