Teams

GREEN VALLEY CC 55AW6.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesChristine MacHado / Jocelyn Frame vs Lillian Arvisu / Fely Mariuzza6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Towey / Wendy Duncan vs Imelda Lee / Andrea Li Fen Hsu2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarole Tarantino / Tina Barker vs Bobbi Jacoby / Cynthia Bazan5-7, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTina Barker / Maggie Celestini vs Imelda Lee / Andrea Li Fen Hsu3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristine MacHado / Kaori Mimaki vs Michelle D Mcguire / Fely Mariuzza6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWendy Duncan / Terri Connelly vs Robyn Sickler / Cynthia Bazan6-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesCarole Tarantino / Joanne McConlogue vs Fely Mariuzza / Victoria Mangaser4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKaori Mimaki / Tina Barker vs Annette Clear / Cynthia Bazan6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJackie Lopez / Terri Connelly vs Andrea Li Fen Hsu / Imelda Lee7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMaggie Celestini / Kimberly McAlister vs Karen Hill / Fely Mariuzza6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJocelyn Frame / Carol Kim vs Robyn Sickler / Michelle D Mcguire2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Duncan / Brenda Zanassi vs Bobbi Jacoby / Imelda Lee3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKimberly McAlister / Kaori Mimaki vs Cynthia Bazan / Imelda Lee6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarole Tarantino / Joanne McConlogue vs Lillian Arvisu / Karen Hill6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Kim / Jocelyn Frame vs Michelle D Mcguire / Andrea Li Fen Hsu6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Maggie Celestini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Kimberly McAlister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Joanne McConlogue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Jocelyn Frame
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Brenda Zanassi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Christine MacHado
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Kaori Mimaki
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Carole Tarantino
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Carol Kim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Wendy Duncan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Tina Barker
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Jackie Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.31
Kelly Towey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Connelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Kim + Jocelyn Frame4448% games−1.7% vs expected
Carole Tarantino + Carol Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly McAlister + Maggie Celestini213 matchesnot enough data
Joanne McConlogue + Christine MacHado213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Celestini
30W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Kimberly McAlister
31W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Joanne McConlogue
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Jocelyn Frame
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Brenda Zanassi
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Christine MacHado
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Kaori Mimaki
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Carole Tarantino
8W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Carol Kim
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Wendy Duncan
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
Tina Barker
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Jackie Lopez
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
Kelly Towey
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
Terri Connelly
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.