Teams

ACraver-HVCC

2025 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-16vs JMyers-CHCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Perun / Betsy Euler vs Kate Souto / Kimberly Jeffs6-1, 7-6
2025-04-16vs AHeymann-UNCLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetsy Euler / Emily Huckabee vs Anne Heymann / Kate Harshbarger0-6, 2-6
2025-04-09vs LGotwals-HRWon 10
W#2 DoublesBetsy Euler / Susan Peak vs Lissa Gotwals / Kristy Clare6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-02vs LWollman-CHCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Huckabee / Stephanie Perun vs Julie Vozella / Laurie Oakley6-0, 7-5
2025-03-19vs JMyers-CHCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Grigg / Stephanie Perun vs Joli Stockwell / Marci Hansen0-6, 0-6
2025-03-18vs LGotwals-HRWon 10
W#1 DoublesBetsy Euler / Laurie Myer vs Barbie McGarrah / Kristy Clare6-2, 7-6
2025-03-12vs AHeymann-UNCLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacey Smith / Betsy Euler vs Maria Hernandez / LAURIE KIEFFER1-6, 4-6
2025-02-26vs LWollman-CHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Grigg / Susan Peak vs Carrie Williamson / Valerie Williams3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCindi White vs Stacey Lange0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Huckabee / Courtney Mumford vs Julie Vozella / Laurie Oakley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Betsy Euler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.90
Laurie Myer
published
2.84
Stephanie Perun
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Mary Grigg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Courtney Mumford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Elizabeth Everett
published
2.48
Emily Huckabee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Susan Peak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Cindi White
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Grigg + Elizabeth Everett134 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Euler + Stephanie Perun213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Betsy Euler
139W–108L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
Laurie Myer
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Stephanie Perun
34W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Mary Grigg
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Courtney Mumford
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Everett
8W–20L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Emily Huckabee
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Susan Peak
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.46
2.5
Cindi White
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.