Teams

Ma.Gregson18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-08vs Do.Marks18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Weslander / Kwame Owens vs Larry Leins / Bill Green6-1, 6-1
2023-09-24vs Ca.Collado18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesMaxwell Gregson / Brett Eckles vs Craig Brehmer / Pedro Loaiza6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Weslander / Kwame Owens vs Pete Vammino / Brent Lamm6-1, 6-2
2023-09-20vs Br.Townsend18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesReece Desonglo / Kwame Owens vs Brett Compton / Kyle Faltisco6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrett Eckles / Naveen Natesh vs Brian Ross / Damien Graham6-2, 6-1
2023-09-18vs St.Wingo18C7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrett Eckles / Naveen Natesh vs Matt Shait / Neil Hauge3-6, 4-6
2023-08-27vs Wi.Edwards18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesYoungjun Lee / Kwame Owens vs Howard Critcher / Blake Paro6-1, 6-1
2023-08-06vs Ti.Koves18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaxwell Gregson / Brett Eckles vs Timothy Koves / Chris Mauro6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Weslander / Andrew Perdue vs Mike Elstob / Jeffrey Brooks6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKwame Owens / Visakan Jayakumar vs Rob Sellick / Daniel Hill6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Kwame Owens
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.44
Andrew Perdue
published 4.5
4.43
Brett Eckles
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.31
Sean Hammer
published
4.25
Patrick Shields
published
Blake Hutchinson
published 4.5
4.23
Visakan Jayakumar
published
4.06
Michael Weslander
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.06
Youngjun Lee
published
3.93
Maxwell Gregson
published
3.65
Reece Desonglo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Eckles + Andrew Perdue5254% games+4.2% vs expected
Brett Eckles + Michael Weslander6070% gamesnot enough data
Brett Eckles + Kwame Owens5165% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Perdue + Patrick Shields303 matchesnot enough data
Maxwell Gregson + Visakan Jayakumar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Kwame Owens
168W–56L career · 7 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.52
4.5
Andrew Perdue
33W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
4.43
Sean Hammer
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
Patrick Shields
40W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Blake Hutchinson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Visakan Jayakumar
24W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
4
Michael Weslander
214W–93L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
4.06
Youngjun Lee
31W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
4.06
Maxwell Gregson
23W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
Reece Desonglo
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.