Teams

The Slice Girls

2026 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

18 players · average NTRP 2.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-25vs Smash SistersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Kinahan / Tara Anthes vs Natalie Chatfield / Maureen Braley2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Jimenez / Elaine Key vs Leslie Wolf / Summer Wade6-2, 6-0
2026-06-18vs Smash SistersWon 20
W#1 DoublesTara Anthes / Sally Gottschall vs Beverly Takeuchi / Grace McManus6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Kinahan / Lauren Jimenez vs Sandra Holmes / Michele Bowden6-3, 6-4
2026-06-09vs Smash SistersLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Moxley / Man Lai Yung-Chen vs Summer Wade / Beverly Takeuchi0-6, 4-6
2026-06-02vs Smash SistersLost 01
L#2 DoublesKara Taub / Kellee Hardesty vs Sandra Holmes / Summer Wade6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-01Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSally Gottschall vs Natalie Chatfield1-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs Smash SistersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSally Gottschall / Tara Anthes vs Kathryn Carberry / Summer Wade6-1, 6-2
2026-05-19vs Smash SistersLost 01
L#2 DoublesSally Gottschall / Man Lai Yung-Chen vs Maureen Braley / Beverly Takeuchi2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Angela Little
published 2.5
2.58
Jessica Hardesty
published 2.5
2.55
Jennifer Ritchie
published 2.5
2.54
Elaine Key
published 2.5
2.50
Cristina Daccarett
published 2.5
2.37
Jackie Whitesell
published 2.5
2.26
Caitlin Kinahan
published 2.5
2.13
Julie Simon
published 2.5
2.10
Debra Purdy
published 2.5
2.10
Martine Castoro
published 2.5
2.05
Abby Burtness
published 2.5
Kara Taub
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kellee Hardesty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Jimenez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Man Lai Yung-Chen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Moxley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sally Gottschall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Tara Anthes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Purdy + Martine Castoro0623% gamesnot enough data
Jackie Whitesell + Debra Purdy044 matchesnot enough data
Cristina Daccarett + Man Lai Yung-Chen044 matchesnot enough data
Julie Simon + Sally Gottschall044 matchesnot enough data
Man Lai Yung-Chen + Jennifer Ritchie044 matchesnot enough data
Sally Gottschall + Elaine Key044 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Ritchie + Jessica Hardesty404 matchesnot enough data
Jackie Whitesell + Martine Castoro033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Angela Little
21W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%22%78%
2.61
2.5
Jessica Hardesty
4W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
2.5
Jennifer Ritchie
5W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
2.5
Elaine Key
4W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%39%61%
2.54
2.5
Cristina Daccarett
27W–28L career · no lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
2.5
Jackie Whitesell
26W–23L career · no lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Caitlin Kinahan
5W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Julie Simon
4W–15L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Debra Purdy
4W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Martine Castoro
15W–54L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Abby Burtness
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Kara Taub
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kellee Hardesty
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Jimenez
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Man Lai Yung-Chen
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Moxley
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sally Gottschall
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tara Anthes
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.