Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Krebsbach/Arena

2024 USTA Mixed 18 & Over · mixed 10.0 18 & over

9 players · average NTRP 4.83 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-15vs Liberty Park Tennis-SterbenzWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatt Sweet / Amanda Pratzel vs Cole Paterson / Meagan Seay6-3, 6-2
2024-06-09vs Liberty Park Tennis-SterbenzWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Pratzel / Matt Sweet vs Cole Paterson / Lisa Sterbenz6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatherine Rist / Corbin Benson vs Diana Granger / Shawn Hancock6-2, 6-2
2024-05-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesJason Hardin / Katherine Rist vs Heidi Gordon / Shawn Hancock6-0, 6-3
2024-05-21vs Liberty Park Tennis-SterbenzWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Delong / Amanda Pratzel vs Arthur Miyazaki / Diana Granger7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · mixed 10.0 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park Tennis-Krebsbach/Arena50132569
2Liberty Park Tennis-Sterbenz0521326157

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.04
Amanda Pratzel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.95
Matt Sweet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Corbin Benson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.69
Sierra Krebsbach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.45
Ashley Miyazaki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.44
Jason Hardin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.43
Katherine Rist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.24
Justin Delong
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Arena + Sierra Krebsbach8170% games+5.2% vs expected
Jason Hardin + Sierra Krebsbach7072% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Miyazaki + Matt Sweet5064% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Pratzel + Justin Delong303 matchesnot enough data
Matt Sweet + Sierra Krebsbach303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amanda Pratzel
66W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
5.04
Matt Sweet
44W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
4.95
5
Christopher Arena
20W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Corbin Benson
16W–1L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Sierra Krebsbach
107W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
4.69
4.5
Ashley Miyazaki
107W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
4.45
Jason Hardin
83W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
4.44
Katherine Rist
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Justin Delong
51W–17L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
4.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.