Miller-55/3.0/M/Francos

2026 Man · Cov Adult 55 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

Schedule

Flight standings3 teams · Cov Adult 55 & Over - Men

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1Johnston- 55/3.0/M/Stonecreek	6	0	15	3	10	120
2Miller-55/3.0/M/Francos	3	3	8	10	21	154
3Maloney 3.0/55/M/Pelican	0	6	4	14	30	199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05

Amintas Major

usually #1 Doubles 95%, also #2 Doubles 5% · published 3

2.62

Adam Scarbrough

usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 3

2.59

Jody Harper

usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published —

—

John Shylock

usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published —

—

Mark Glassett

usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Robert Barrosse

usually #3 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published —

—

Roger Kocken

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —

—

Ted Ashby

usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Shylock + Amintas Major	7–3	60% games	not enough data
Adam Scarbrough + Mark Glassett	1–4	38% games	not enough data
Adam Scarbrough + Jody Harper	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Roger Kocken + Mark Glassett	1–2	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Amintas Major

14W–7L career · type S · 19 lines in 2026

<1%36%64%

3.05

Adam Scarbrough

11W–29L career · 25 lines in 2026

21%79%<1%

2.62

—

Jody Harper

10W–36L career · 18 lines in 2026

27%73%<1%

2.59

—

John Shylock

34W–27L career · 29 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Mark Glassett

13W–35L career · 22 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Robert Barrosse

10W–12L career · 11 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Roger Kocken

4W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ted Ashby

29W–22L career · 35 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.