Teams

GILLIES 4.0

2026 USTA MXD Adult 40 & Over Dec 27-Jan 4 · 4.0 MIXED 40 (Draw Filled Limit 4 Teams)

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 MIXED 40 (Draw Filled Limit 4 Teams) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Stephanie Steele
published
3.86
Sharon Garrison
published
3.72
Lillian Joyce
published
3.69
James Steele
published 4
3.67
Wendy Brandon
published
3.59
Neil Matson
published
3.55
Craig Hovan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Courtney Perrin
published 4
3.42
Eric Garrison
published 3.5
3.39
Scott Gillies
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Gillies + Neil Matson4259% games+6.4% vs expected
Courtney Perrin + Wendy Brandon4450% games−6.8% vs expected
Craig Hovan + Eric Garrison213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Steele
147W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.94
Sharon Garrison
111W–35L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
Lillian Joyce
44W–29L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
4
James Steele
55W–65L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Wendy Brandon
127W–116L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Neil Matson
107W–65L career · no lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Craig Hovan
88W–60L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
4
Courtney Perrin
18W–30L career · no lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Eric Garrison
67W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
Scott Gillies
108W–91L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.