Teams

Coopwood/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-16vs Miller/MemphisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesNatrez Crawford / Ryan Coopwood vs Kevin Miller / Bret Stockton7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChris Garner / Alan Willis vs John Castany / Doug Wilson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-11-12vs Mohler/MemphisWon 31
W#1 DoublesCepada Ransfer / Alan Willis vs Huan Nguyen / John Stukenborg7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChris Garner vs Jonathan Mohler2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRyan Coopwood vs Michael Mohler5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesArun Sashidharan / Brian Chapman vs Jay Thakkar / Ryan Aghabeg3-6, 2-6
2024-11-11vs Cooper/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesRyan Coopwood / Chad Alford vs Kevin Gallimore / Dylan Plumlee3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGarrett Weinberg / Natrez Crawford vs Kevin Roedel / Rob Dannemiller1-6, 2-6
2024-11-03vs Ensell/MemphisWon 41
W#1 DoublesMatt Gronostaj / Cepada Ransfer vs Rhett Brandt / Robert O'Bryan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChris Garner vs Dan Whitley6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlan Willis / Stephen Ellis vs James Ensell / Stuart Breakstone5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNatrez Crawford vs John Doe6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrian Chapman / Arun Sashidharan vs Paul Fultz / Deepak Chandramouli6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-10-20vs Reesman/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesChris Garner / Stephen Ellis vs Kjell Wander / Dan Huss3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAlan Willis vs Zachary Elliott6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRyan Coopwood / Lloyd Nesbitt vs Jon Reesman / Curt Goetsch2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNatrez Crawford vs Nick Berger6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrandon Jackson / Brian Chapman vs Glenn Neilson / Chuck House0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Chris Garner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Reid Stuart
published
2.96
Ryan Coopwood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.82
Alan Willis
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Matt Gronostaj
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Arun Sashidharan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Cepada Ransfer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brian Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lloyd Nesbitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Natrez Crawford
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Garner
11W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Reid Stuart
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Ryan Coopwood
28W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Alan Willis
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Matt Gronostaj
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Arun Sashidharan
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Cepada Ransfer
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
2.5
Brian Chapman
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lloyd Nesbitt
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Natrez Crawford
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.