Teams

Kingsdale Novice

2025 Combo 18 & Over Novice 2.5 Women · 2.5 Combo Novice - Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-22vs Coleman/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gennace / Lauren Campbell vs Sofie Coleman / Kelley Herr3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlix Crutcher / Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo vs Caitlin Simms / Mary Ruoff4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAmy Thompson / Anna Kerper vs Shanda Scott / Brittany Lederer6-1, 7-6
2025-10-21vs Little/Rogers/SVCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Campbell / Jennifer Gennace vs Kathleen Hooley / Hailey Frost6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKeqian Min / Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo vs Jalan Little / Jane Blommel4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-10-16vs Little/Rogers/SVCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesLongyu Wang / Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo vs Hailey Frost / Jane Blommel6-4, 7-6
2025-09-14vs Coleman/Rogers/SVCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Thompson / Amanda Staggs vs Erin Hulliberger / Mary Ruoff2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlix Crutcher / Jennifer Gennace vs Shanda Scott / Kelley Herr0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Kerper / Longyu Wang vs Sofie Coleman / Caitlin Simms1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Combo Novice - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Lacey Mitchell
published
2.50
Longyu Wang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alix Crutcher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Amanda Staggs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Erica Davis
published
1.98
Anna Kerper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jennifer Gennace
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Keqian Min
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo + Jennifer Gennace123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lacey Mitchell
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
Longyu Wang
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Alix Crutcher
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Amanda Staggs
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Erica Davis
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Anna Kerper
2W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Jennifer Gennace
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keqian Min
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.