Teams

Planet Swim - Eulenfeld

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-01-26vs San Jose - AndradeWon 32
W#1 DoublesAlexis Gambardella / Tory Eulenfeld vs Katie Lazzara / Cynthia Hodges6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMae Coleman vs Amelia Smith6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKerry Marrou / Kristyn Roseborough vs Amy Malaikham / Jami Bueker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Sunman / Brooke Tsao vs Dixie McDaniel de Andrade / Kristin Getz4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#4 DoublesValerie Dolan / Pam Bradley vs Margaret Samuels / Caroline Ritchie5-7, 5-7
2025-01-12vs Deerwood - BirdsongWon 31
W#1 DoublesTory Eulenfeld / Alexis Gambardella vs Lisa Aboudan / Sheri Goldstein7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKerry Marrou / Rebecca Roberts vs Suzan Birdsong / Holly Delaney6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMae Coleman / Cheryl Mosley vs Robyn Sieron / Poppi Elias6-1, 6-2
L#4 DoublesLisa Adams / Kristyn Roseborough vs Patricia Sogueco / Angie Wood4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Alexis Gambardella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Sarah Hanson
published
3.00
Jacqueline Ciocca
published
3.00
Cheryl Mosley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Kristyn Roseborough
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Valerie Dolan
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Tory Eulenfeld
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Brooke Tsao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jaime Rowe
published
Kerry Marrou
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mae Coleman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Pam Bradley
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Postell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Ciocca + Alexis Gambardella314 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Dolan + Pam Bradley134 matchesnot enough data
Kristyn Roseborough + Kerry Marrou303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexis Gambardella
11W–5L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Sarah Hanson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Jacqueline Ciocca
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.00
3
Cheryl Mosley
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kristyn Roseborough
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Valerie Dolan
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Tory Eulenfeld
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
2.5
Brooke Tsao
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
Jaime Rowe
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerry Marrou
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mae Coleman
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Bradley
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Postell
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.