Teams

UTC - Losch

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.0 W

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-30vs LEECHAR/Jicha/18&Over3.0WLost 13
L#1 DoublesLindsey Losch / SHEILA CLARK vs Theresa Raker / Beth Workman2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Ramirez vs Diana Barajas6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristina Casteel / Bettina Rubio vs Tina Hanten / Heather Intress2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRoberta Teixeira / Gina Travis vs Diane Catalano / Diane Chilcote4-6, 3-2
2025-06-09vs Lake Kennedy - NewtonLost 13
L#1 DoublesBettina Rubio / SHEILA CLARK vs Susan Jacoby / Sandra Kent1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Ramirez vs Christina Howard6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJill Adamczyk / Christina Casteel vs Ann Schlensker / Marcy Till1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGina Travis / Roberta Teixeira vs Cathleen Wei / Sandra Brown2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-12vs Lake Kennedy - NewtonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristina Casteel / Roberta Teixeira vs Susan Jacoby / Heather Mazurkiewicz0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Ramirez vs Amy Newton6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJill Adamczyk / Elaina Didier vs Marcy Till / Ann Schlensker2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesYara Sabha / Yelena Vasyutskaya vs Sandra Brown / Antoinette McGarey6-2, 6-2
2025-05-05vs LEECHAR/Jicha/18&Over3.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesSHEILA CLARK / Andrea Ramirez vs Beth Workman / Theresa Raker0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYara Sabha / Yelena Vasyutskaya vs Heather Intress / Diane Catalano5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBettina Rubio / Kaitlin Whitaker vs Debbie Johanessen / Diane Chilcote6-0, 0-6, 1-0
2025-04-21vs Lake Kennedy - NewtonLost 13
L#1 DoublesYara Sabha / Yelena Vasyutskaya vs Lenka Doyle / Susan Jacoby3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAndrea Ramirez vs Heather Mazurkiewicz6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRoberta Teixeira / Christina Casteel vs Cathleen Wei / Sandra Kent3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCiceley Sioma / MALICA KOVALCHUK vs Ann Schlensker / JEANNIE THWAITES1-6, 1-6
2025-04-14vs LEECHAR/Jicha/18&Over3.0WLost 13
L#1 DoublesYara Sabha / Yelena Vasyutskaya vs Beth Workman / Theresa Raker5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Ramirez vs Diane Chilcote6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLindsey Losch / SHEILA CLARK vs Julie Osoteo / Heather Intress7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJill Adamczyk / Elaina Didier vs Tina Hanten / Diane Catalano2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Yelena Vasyutskaya
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
SHEILA CLARK
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Andrea Ramirez
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Ciceley Sioma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Christina Casteel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Jill Adamczyk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Bettina Rubio
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elaina Didier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Gina Travis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kaitlin Whitaker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Losch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
MALICA KOVALCHUK
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roberta Teixeira
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Yara Sabha
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Adamczyk + Elaina Didier044 matchesnot enough data
Yara Sabha + Yelena Vasyutskaya224 matchesnot enough data
Yelena Vasyutskaya + Christina Casteel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yelena Vasyutskaya
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.05
SHEILA CLARK
3W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.99
3.5
Andrea Ramirez
10W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Ciceley Sioma
0W–1L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Christina Casteel
4W–11L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Jill Adamczyk
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.61
3
Bettina Rubio
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Elaina Didier
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gina Travis
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kaitlin Whitaker
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Losch
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
MALICA KOVALCHUK
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Roberta Teixeira
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yara Sabha
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.