Teams

WNCJ Kersey (Peachtree)

Singles League 40 & Over NC WNC 2025 · 40+ Women 3.5 - Sunday PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-06vs WNCD Jackson (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAlice Robbins vs Denise Jackson1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Kersey vs Lisa Young3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesTracy Becker vs Sharlyn Aamodt4-6, 3-6
2025-07-27vs WNCD Jackson (HRC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesTracy Becker vs Kelly Gillis1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesChristine Allan vs Marie Cowan2-6, 1-6
2025-07-20vs WNCD Jackson (HRC)Won 10
W#2 SinglesKelly Emoff vs Brenda Bowie6-1, 6-1
2025-07-13vs WNCD Jackson (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesChristine Allan vs Lisa Young1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSusan Fitzmaurice vs Marie Cowan2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAlice Robbins vs Susan Baum4-6, 6-7
2025-07-06Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKelly Emoff vs Denise Jackson3-6, 0-6
2025-07-02vs WNCD Jackson (HRC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAlice Robbins vs Kelly Gillis1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSusan Fitzmaurice vs Brenda Bowie4-6, 5-7
2025-06-22vs WNCD Jackson (HRC)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJennifer Kersey vs Sharlyn Aamodt6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesTracy Becker vs Denise Jackson0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesSusan Fitzmaurice vs Lisa Young0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Women 3.5 - Sunday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Jennifer Kersey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.26
Christine Allan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Kelly Emoff
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Tracy Becker
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.22
Melissa Coles
published
3.18
Alice Robbins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Susan Fitzmaurice
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Fitzmaurice + Alice Robbins5849% games−5.0% vs expected
Kelly Emoff + Tracy Becker0530% games−10.5% vs expected
Susan Fitzmaurice + Jennifer Kersey224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Kersey + Christine Allan404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Kersey + Kelly Emoff314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Coles + Kelly Emoff303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kersey
27W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Christine Allan
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Kelly Emoff
61W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Tracy Becker
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Melissa Coles
25W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Alice Robbins
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Susan Fitzmaurice
11W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.