Teams

Team 1

2022 NOVA Adult 55 & Over · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.08 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-19vs Team 3 IvanWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Luftglass / Christopher Beausoleil vs Steve Latourette / Marc Dalton6-3, 6-3
2022-08-17vs Team 2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarlos Miletti / Geoffrey Montgomery vs Scott Wallace / Daniel Mandl3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-14vs Team 4 High RollersWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristopher Beausoleil / Geoffrey Montgomery vs Jordan Bentley / Charles Hughes7-5, 3-3
L#2 DoublesRobert Luftglass / Stephen Worrall vs Eric Nguyen / Ronald Embry3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDan Winicour / Dane Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesGeoffrey Montgomery / Mark Matsko vs Henry Yung / Dean Floria6-4, 6-2
2022-08-08vs Team 2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDan Winicour / Dane Smith vs Haider Abbud / DONALD CRAWLEY3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Luftglass / Mark Matsko vs John Marshall Hand / Gary Coiro1-6, 0-6
2022-08-06vs Team 4 High RollersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSam Collins / Robert Luftglass vs Jordan Bentley / Eyad Abuhamda6-7, 3-4
W#2 DoublesGeoffrey Montgomery / Christopher Beausoleil vs Jeff Buhl / Charles Hughes6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-31vs Team 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesGeoffrey Montgomery / Mark Matsko vs Steve McCoy / Haider Abbud1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-29vs Team 4 High RollersWon 10
W#2 DoublesGeoffrey Montgomery / Mark Matsko vs Eyad Abuhamda / Jeff Buhl6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Dan Winicour
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.84
Geoffrey Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.81
Mark Matsko
published
3.78
Carlos Miletti
published 4
3.56
Stephen Worrall
published
3.55
Robert Luftglass
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Ronald Oberbillig
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dan Winicour
106W–63L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Geoffrey Montgomery
320W–242L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
Mark Matsko
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Everett Diederiks
19W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Carlos Miletti
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Christopher Beausoleil
1W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Worrall
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Robert Luftglass
69W–94L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Ronald Oberbillig
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.