Teams

3-KMoore-HVCC

2023 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-25vs 1-CWilliamson-CHCCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMelinda Duncker / Stacey Smith vs Lisa Munster / Laura Horrigan3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBetsy Euler vs Lindsay Roofe Lavin6-2, 6-4
2023-04-18vs 2-LKieffer-UNCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelanie Biese / Betsy Euler vs LAURIE KIEFFER / Brienne Caranasos6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHadley Nixon / Lauren Powell vs Samantha Terhune / Rebecca Tomasini6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelinda Duncker / Stacey Smith vs Ilana Osten / Amber Byrd6-2, 6-1
2023-04-06vs 1-CWilliamson-CHCCWon 20
W#2 SinglesBetsy Euler vs Lisa Munster6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelinda Duncker / Joanie Preyer vs Carrie Williamson / Mignon Lunsford6-4, 6-0
2023-03-28vs 2-LKieffer-UNCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHadley Nixon / Meredith Butler vs Kelly Johnson / Brienne Caranasos6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoanie Preyer / Melinda Duncker vs Anne Heymann / Lauren Zedek6-3, 6-0
2023-03-16vs 2-LKieffer-UNCLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetsy Euler / Lauren Powell vs Rebecca Tomasini / Jennifer Gates-Foster6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Ingle / Betsy Euler vs Leslie Fernandez / Lauren Ciapciak6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-07vs 2-LKieffer-UNCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Ingle / Betsy Euler vs Kelly Johnson / Rebecca Tomasini6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHadley Nixon vs Lauren Zedek6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Hadley Nixon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Kristen Ingle
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.12
Melanie Biese
published
3.08
Betsy Euler
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
3.02
Melinda Duncker
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.97
Lauren Powell
published
2.96
Joanie Preyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Euler + Melinda Duncker16855% games+7.1% vs expected
Hadley Nixon + Kristen Ingle4351% gamesnot enough data
Betsy Euler + Kristen Ingle4254% gamesnot enough data
Hadley Nixon + Melinda Duncker5157% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Biese + Kristen Ingle134 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Euler + Hadley Nixon044 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Powell + Hadley Nixon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hadley Nixon
77W–65L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Kristen Ingle
60W–43L career · 9 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Melanie Biese
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Betsy Euler
139W–108L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Melinda Duncker
80W–61L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
Lauren Powell
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Joanie Preyer
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.