Teams

Sky - Joyce

2023 Marion Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult Women 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Tana Hubbard vs Kimberly Brewer / Nneka Nwakoby7-6, 6-2
2023-06-03vs SMW - BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Tana Hubbard vs Lorraine Hollweg / Rosemary Wilkins6-2, 6-1
2023-05-28vs Ace KickersWon 10
W#1 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Helen Sweeney vs Cheryl Prusak / Kimberly Scudder Thompson7-6, 6-1
2023-05-07vs MARION/Millsaps/40&Over3.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Helen Sweeney vs Natalie Petsche / Nicole Millsaps6-2, 6-1
2023-05-06vs Ace KickersWon 10
W#1 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Ada Baker vs Cheryl Prusak / Kimberly Scudder Thompson6-0, 7-6
2023-04-16vs SMW - BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Peggy Ridgway vs Rhonda Lane / Cindy Barnard3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-04-01vs SMW - BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Peggy Ridgway vs Yazmin Ayala / Tabitha Hatten6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Helen Sweeney
published 4
3.55
Debra Malone
published 4
3.32
Carol Hirsch
published 3.5
3.24
Irma Buttermore
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Carmen Rosengarten
published 3.5
2.98
Kim Arcobello
published
2.97
Henny David
published 3.5
2.72
Ketty Smith
published
Peggy Ridgway
published
Rita Meek
published
Tana Hubbard
published
Tracy Shisler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Henny David + Tana Hubbard134 matchesnot enough data
Carol Hirsch + Rita Meek303 matchesnot enough data
Irma Buttermore + Rita Meek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helen Sweeney
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Debra Malone
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Carol Hirsch
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Irma Buttermore
86W–80L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Carmen Rosengarten
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
Kim Arcobello
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.98
3.5
Henny David
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
Ketty Smith
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
Peggy Ridgway
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rita Meek
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tana Hubbard
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Shisler
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.