Teams

Er.Oliver40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-30vs Me.Proctor40CWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrandy Vannoy / Kelly Hurter vs Darsan Russo / Susan Potter6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDebi Booker / Angela McGee vs Michelle Mueller / Ashley Stephenson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-16vs Je.Komes40C2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Hurter / Kathleen Lalor vs Jenny Komes / Kenie Wrenn0-6, 4-6
2023-09-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline Ives / Erica Oliver vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-26vs Ka.Wahle40CWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrandy Vannoy / Karen Bornhofen vs Amanda Meyer / Ann Flores1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCaroline Ives / Angela McGee vs Christine Brandt / Julendia Gaillard6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKathleen Lalor / Kelly Hurter vs Lacey Seaton / Mary McCulley6-2, 6-1
2023-08-19vs Sa.Highsmith40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesCaroline Ives / Angela McGee vs Kristen Patch / Sally Highsmith3-6, 2-6
2023-08-18vs Ca.Langlois40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesNina Schweitzer / Brandy Vannoy vs Catherine Langlois / Michele Gan6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathleen Lalor / Kelly Hurter vs Elizabeth Pavese / Teri Wallace6-3, 6-3
2023-08-12vs Fr.Harris40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrandy Vannoy / Nina Schweitzer vs Amanda Shelton / Casey Novak6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErica Oliver / Kelly Hurter vs Cathy Marion / Catherine Wilborne3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDebi Booker / Angela McGee vs Mindy Hamlin / Erin Maher7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Karen Bornhofen
published
2.67
Angela McGee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.62
Kelly Hurter
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.47
Caroline Ives
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.27
Brandy Vannoy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.24
Nina Schweitzer
published
2.21
Debi Booker
published 2.5
2.02
Gina Hardy
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela McGee + Kelly Hurter8260% games+10.7% vs expected
Angela McGee + Caroline Ives4645% games+1.2% vs expected
Kelly Hurter + Brandy Vannoy3246% gamesnot enough data
Caroline Ives + Kelly Hurter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Bornhofen
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
2.5
Angela McGee
47W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%10%90%
2.67
2.5
Kelly Hurter
54W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%19%81%
2.62
3
Caroline Ives
23W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Brandy Vannoy
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.27
Nina Schweitzer
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Debi Booker
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Gina Hardy
2W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.