Teams

FMRC - Jordan

2024 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 18 & Over Spring · 7.5 M Wednesday EVE

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs Hancock - ZaliauskasLost 01
L#2 DoublesDan Campbell / Rankin McGougan vs William Leaf / Gindrutis Zaliauskas6-7, 2-6
2024-05-22vs FGCU - CrivelloWon 10
W#1 DoublesDan Campbell / Michael Cremer vs Alejandro Diaz Lucente / Tim Riggs6-4, 6-3
2024-05-15vs LEECHAR/McGirl/Combo18&over7.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesDan Campbell / Michael Cremer vs Matthew Clevenger / Felix Varlam3-6, 5-7
2024-05-08vs Hancock - ZaliauskasSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarcus Soori / Dan Campbell vs John Regets / John O Velazquez Gonzalez4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEdward Pike / Carmelo Rubio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-24vs LEECHAR/McGirl/Combo18&over7.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Lou Bottitta vs Franklin Lewandowski / Julian Rivero2-6, 2-6
2024-04-17vs Hancock - ZaliauskasLost 01
L#2 DoublesTim Hamilton / Dan Campbell vs Vince Zaliauskas / Michael Krumwiede3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-10vs FGCU - CrivelloLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Marcus Soori vs Chris Gold / Alejandro Diaz Lucente2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Wednesday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Dan Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
David Binkley
published 3.5
2.90
Carmelo Rubio
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Edward Pike
published
Jeff Jordan
published
Lou Bottitta
published
Marcus Soori
published
Michael Cremer
published
Rankin McGougan
published
Tim Hamilton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Campbell + Carmelo Rubio2647% gamesnot enough data
Edward Pike + David Binkley1525% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dan Campbell
123W–106L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
David Binkley
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Carmelo Rubio
254W–234L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
Edward Pike
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Jordan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lou Bottitta
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcus Soori
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Cremer
61W–32L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rankin McGougan
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Hamilton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.