Teams

NetSuccess 3.0W Singles

2023 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-10-27vs I'm a Singles Lady 3.0WLost 03
L#1 SinglesAnne McKissick vs Susanne Gibbons0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBeth Slomine vs Marie Welsh3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesCandace Tomczak vs Nichole Hauswirth1-6, 2-6
2023-10-22vs String Theory 3.0W SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesCandace Tomczak vs Becky Ronayne6-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAnne McKissick vs Colleen Quinlan3-6, 0-6
2023-10-16Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBeth Slomine vs Jennifer Ivester3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTrina Culbreath vs Keyonna Baker1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRomina Averza vs Chrissy Adair1-6, 0-6
2023-10-08Lost 01
L#2 SinglesTrina Culbreath vs Tetiana Vagizova2-6, 4-6
2023-10-04vs I'm a Singles Lady 3.0WWon 10
W#2 SinglesCandace Tomczak vs Lindsay Preissler6-2, 6-4
2023-10-03vs String Theory 3.0W SinglesLost 02
L#2 SinglesAnne McKissick vs Laura Lewandowski4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesRomina Averza vs Sarah Lynne Walsh7-6, 2-3
2023-10-01vs Racq Pack 3.0W SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesCandace Tomczak vs Delaney Burkart3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBeth Slomine vs Grace Tran4-6, 1-6
2023-09-18Lost 01
L#2 SinglesRomina Averza vs Tetiana Vagizova2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBeth Slomine vs Reoni Mapp2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesTrina Culbreath vs Chrissy Adair3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Jose Toro
published
2.81
Candace Tomczak
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.77
Anne McKissick
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.76
Beth Slomine
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.73
Trina Culbreath
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.38
Romina Averza
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.98
Kavita Kalra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Slomine + Romina Averza1637% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jose Toro
31W–69L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Candace Tomczak
62W–118L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Anne McKissick
94W–129L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Beth Slomine
40W–99L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Trina Culbreath
16W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Romina Averza
30W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%82%18%
2.38
Kavita Kalra
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.