Teams

Laughs & Smiles

2022 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.60 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-21vs Unleashed 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesRohan Raikar / Reginald Tull vs Farooq Jaffrey / Bill Gehrke7-6, 6-0
2022-06-06vs Miletti-CadyWon 10
W#3 DoublesRyan Cinoman / David Turner vs Derek Ireland / Scott Washow7-5, 7-5
2022-06-02vs Unleashed 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesSam Lieber / Reginald Tull vs Rohan Bhale / Corey Glocker6-0, 6-3
2022-05-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesRyan Cinoman / Sam Lieber vs Adam August / David Rosen6-3, 6-5
2022-05-17vs Miletti-CadyWon 20
W#1 DoublesSam Lieber / Reginald Tull vs Thomas Berray / Vince Ha5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Cinoman / Ray Stewart vs Garrett Kessler / Rob Rivera7-5, 6-0
2022-05-15vs Unleashed 2Won 20
W#1 DoublesSubodh Arora / Ryan Cinoman vs Gregory Fox / Alexander Thomas6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKenny Callender / Reginald Tull vs Rohan Bhale / Sandeep Kasat6-3, 6-2
2022-05-04vs Miletti-CadySplit 11
W#2 DoublesRyan Cinoman / Barghav Hariharan vs Scott Washow / Christopher Cosca6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesReginald Tull / Victor Wong vs Rory Smith / Leonard Tetteh3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-23vs Full SpeedLost 02
L#2 SinglesRyan Cinoman vs Kevin Lyle6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRohan Raikar / Reginald Tull vs Chris Ryan / Cosby Hunt6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-11vs Miletti-CadyWon 20
W#1 DoublesRyan Cinoman / Barghav Hariharan vs Christopher Cosca / Scott Washow6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesReginald Tull / Victor Wong vs Rory Smith / Jose Torres6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
4.32
Barghav Hariharan
published 4.5
4.30
Vishnu Menon
published
4.29
Subodh Arora
published
4.26
Ryan Cinoman
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.25
Reginald Tull
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.15
Sam Lieber
published
4.12
Harris Rosenblatt
published 4.5
4.08
Victor Wong
published
Kenny Callender
published
Rohan Raikar
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Gregory Rabinovich
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.81
4.5
Barghav Hariharan
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
Vishnu Menon
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.30
Subodh Arora
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
4.29
4.5
Ryan Cinoman
125W–85L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Reginald Tull
170W–99L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
Sam Lieber
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Harris Rosenblatt
17W–14L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
Victor Wong
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
Kenny Callender
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rohan Raikar
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.