Teams

A4 ACAC Ralston

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-11-20vs A5 TCRC AsherWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Nalls / Deanne Ralston vs Brad Brown / Cam Nguyen6-3, 7-5
2022-10-22vs A8 Willow Oaks PowellWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Zatcoff / Brian Nalls vs Katie Bressler / Terence Blackwood6-2, 6-1
2022-10-08vs A2 Avalon GeorgeLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Nalls / Anne Townsend vs Tim Dolan / Faith Kallman3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Robin Griffith
published
3.34
Dave Bucheit
published 3.5
3.31
Ken Hatcher
published
3.30
Jonathan Meade
published
3.30
Brian Nalls
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Anne Townsend
published 3.5
3.26
Stephen Chandler
published
3.23
Rebecca Cassilly
published
3.21
Jean Davis
published
3.16
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
3.16
Jordan Melland
published
3.14
Ed Shropshire
published 3.5
3.00
Joanne Wilson
published
2.82
Joey Townsend
published
2.82
Mari Litz
published
Lisa Aaron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Wilson + Jordan Melland404 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Meade + Deanne Ralston123 matchesnot enough data
Jean Davis + Ken Hatcher303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robin Griffith
31W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Dave Bucheit
19W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Ken Hatcher
15W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
Jonathan Meade
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Brian Nalls
139W–113L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Anne Townsend
33W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Stephen Chandler
24W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Rebecca Cassilly
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jean Davis
24W–23L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Jordan Melland
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Ed Shropshire
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Joanne Wilson
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.00
Joey Townsend
16W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Mari Litz
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Lisa Aaron
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.