Teams

Winner - Suntree/Dodds

2023 Brevard Adult 18 & Over-Early Start · 3.5 Adult Early Start 18 and Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-28vs TitanTC - LauWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ledene / Sandra Rowe vs Shelly Rosseau / Melissa Rosenquist6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesChristina Carver vs Kate Kimball6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Hirji / Lee Harrington vs Iliana Bleau / Dawn Pfeil6-3, 6-1
2022-11-21vs Rockledge - MelendezWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Fischer / Jill Sanders vs Sherry Houston / Naomi Coleman5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Hirji / Lee Harrington vs Nancy Hastings / Gisela Alcalde6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSandra Rowe / Ann Passmore vs Brenda Knox / Beverly McCullar6-0, 6-2
2022-11-14vs Kiwi - DraperWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandra Rowe / Christina Carver vs Jennifer Jackson / Leesa Brambach6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ledene vs Janaina Minamyer6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Hirji / Lee Harrington vs Tracy Famiano / Allison Wyand6-1, 6-1
2022-11-07vs TitanTC - UrbanWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Carver / Jennifer Ledene vs Katharine Polvino / Sara Hatfield7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSharon Bean / Nancy Fischer vs Shayna Gleckel / Mary Beardall6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSandra Rowe / Ann Passmore vs Jill Hogan / Kristen Crisafulli6-4, 6-3
2022-10-30vs Rockledge - MelendezWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ledene / Christina Carver vs Jeannette Cintron / Gisela Alcalde6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSharon Bean / Sarah Hirji vs Sherry Houston / Miriam Melendez6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Passmore / Sandra Rowe vs Beverly McCullar / Nancy Hastings6-4, 6-2
2022-10-10vs Kiwi - DraperWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ledene / Sandra Rowe vs Tina Murphy / Barbara Burgess6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesChristina Carver vs Heather Boesch6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLee Harrington / Sarah Hirji vs Christina Kopp / Anne Ramsey1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJill Sanders / Nancy Fischer vs Tracy Famiano / Betty Schaub6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-03vs TitanTC - UrbanLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ledene / Sharon Bean vs Mary Beardall / Katharine Polvino5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristina Carver vs Karen Lee6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJill Sanders / Ann Passmore vs Jill Hogan / Catherine Sander2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Rowe / Nancy Fischer vs Kristen Crisafulli / Heather Lawrence0-6, 3-6
2022-09-26vs TitanTC - LauWon 31
W#1 DoublesSharon Bean / Jennifer Ledene vs Michele Heyn / Melissa Rosenquist6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChristina Carver vs Xu Sue Huang6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Fischer / Lee Harrington vs Pauline Mitchell / Dottie Sorrick5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAnn Passmore / Jill Sanders vs Jane Bonvillain / Debbie Chamberlain6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Early Start 18 and Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Christina Carver
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.68
Jennifer Ledene
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4
3.45
Lee Harrington
published
3.35
Sandra Rowe
published
3.33
Ann Passmore
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Sarah Hirji
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Dana Saunders
published 3.5
3.16
Nancy Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
Sharon Bean
published
3.13
Stephanie McIntosh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Passmore + Sarah Hirji81044% games−4.0% vs expected
Nancy Fischer + Sarah Hirji5361% gamesnot enough data
Ann Passmore + Christina Carver7160% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Fischer + Ann Passmore2350% gamesnot enough data
Ann Passmore + Jennifer Ledene2347% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Rowe + Nancy Fischer044 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Ledene + Christina Carver213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Carver
101W–34L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.25
4
Jennifer Ledene
99W–43L career · 7 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Lee Harrington
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Sandra Rowe
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Ann Passmore
135W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Sarah Hirji
135W–91L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Dana Saunders
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Nancy Fischer
67W–70L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Sharon Bean
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Stephanie McIntosh
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.