Teams

Pinellas/Hueholt/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0W

2023 Pinellas Trilevel 18 & Over Summer · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.56 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-17vs Seminole Triple the FunLost 01
L#2 DoublesLiwen Tao / Stacey Castellini vs January Moennig / Kimberly Northup1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-09-10vs Seminole Triple the FunWon 10
W#3 DoublesGail Stallwood / Martha Cornatzer vs Elizabeth Jordan / Moise Carrington6-0, 7-5
2023-08-27vs Seminole Triple the FunLost 12
L#1 DoublesKirsten Willis / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Diana Zarreke / JoAnn Lind6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLiwen Tao / Stacey Castellini vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Robyn Houston vs Maggie Berning / Moise Carrington4-6, 1-6
2023-08-20vs Seminole Triple the FunWon 20
W#1 DoublesKirsten Willis / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Martyne LaDuke / Tiffany Rhodes6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Noella Burgeson vs Moise Carrington / Patty Anderson6-4, 7-6
2023-08-06vs Seminole Triple the FunLost 02
L#2 DoublesAmy Burns / Stacey Castellini vs Kristen Pierce / Julia Pierce2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Amy Hill vs Patty Anderson / Elizabeth Jordan3-6, 4-6
2023-07-30vs Seminole Triple the FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesKirsten Willis / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Cheryl Briske / JoAnn Lind6-1, 6-1
2023-07-23vs Seminole Triple the FunWon 20
W#2 DoublesStacey Castellini / Liwen Tao vs Kristen Pierce / January Moennig7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Noella Burgeson vs Maggie Berning / Kelly Falconer Miller3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-07-16vs Seminole Triple the FunWon 10
W#3 DoublesNoella Burgeson / Kimberly Ankney vs Patty Anderson / Moise Carrington6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Elizabeth Gerlach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.90
Kirsten Willis
published
3.82
Alicia Castaneda
published 4
3.75
Monica Sanchez
published
3.29
Gail Stallwood
published 3.5
3.22
Amy Burns
published 3.5
3.13
Noella Burgeson
published
3.08
Martha Cornatzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Stacey Castellini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Robyn Houston
published
2.68
2.53
Kimberly Ankney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Liwen Tao
published
Mary Turnbull
published
Wendy Unger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Castaneda + Monica Sanchez7353% games−0.4% vs expected
Stacey Castellini + Martha Cornatzer51941% games−14.5% vs expected
Kimberly Ankney + Martha Cornatzer4256% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Castellini + Kimberly Ankney123 matchesnot enough data
Robyn Houston + Kimberly Ankney033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Gerlach
184W–98L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
Kirsten Willis
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.90
4
Alicia Castaneda
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
Monica Sanchez
24W–24L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Gail Stallwood
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Amy Burns
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Noella Burgeson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Martha Cornatzer
117W–130L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Stacey Castellini
23W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Robyn Houston
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Christine Hueholt
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Kimberly Ankney
76W–159L career · 3 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.53
Liwen Tao
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Turnbull
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Unger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.