Teams

Grant - Keswick: Slice Ninjas

2025 Charlottesville Singles · Charlottesville Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-16vs Hubbard - Sweet ShotsWon 30
W#1 SinglesEmma Clancy vs Elizabeth Beasley6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesEmily Granville vs Ann Jones6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesGillian Grant vs Erika Herz6-1, 6-0
2025-10-09vs Farmington- PowellSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEmily Granville vs Meaghan Brody6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesCelia Im vs Katie Cowen3-6, 2-6
2025-10-06vs Johnson - Volley VixensWon 21
L#1 SinglesEmma Clancy vs Stephanie Marcus1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesEmily Granville vs Leigh Rinckel6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMariana Bell vs Susie Jones6-1, 6-1
2025-09-29vs Meyer - All You Need is LobLost 03
L#1 SinglesAmanda Tran vs Christina Meyer1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Granville vs Susan Wunderlich6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCelia Im vs Amy Hensley3-6, 1-6
2025-09-18vs Hubbard - Sweet ShotsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesGillian Grant vs Michelle Ruiz6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAmanda Tran vs Margie Halinski6-2, 6-3
2025-09-08vs Johnson - Volley VixensSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAmanda Tran vs Stephanie Marcus1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesEmily Granville vs Susie Jones7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Mariana Bell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Gillian Grant
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.82
Susan Tracy
published
2.79
Emily Granville
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Jessica Johnson
published 3
2.75
Amanda Tran
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.54
Emma Clancy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.46
Celia Im
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mariana Bell
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Gillian Grant
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Susan Tracy
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Emily Granville
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Jessica Johnson
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amanda Tran
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Emma Clancy
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Celia Im
5W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.