Teams

Goode Team

2025 USTA Mixed 18&Over League - Abilene · 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-21vs 8.0 teamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Bennett / Megan Waagner vs Doug Mauldin / Kristen Gil3-8
W#2 DoublesMeredith Ware / Connor Dale vs Gary Range / Jill Simon8-5
2025-08-18vs 8.0 teamWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Goode / Megan Waagner vs Jill Simon / James Landess9-8
W#2 DoublesBeth Schaeffer / Benjamin Gutierrez vs Gary Range / Elizabeth Everett8-5
2025-08-13vs 8.0 teamWon 30
W#1 DoublesConnor Dale / Sabra Carlton vs James Landess / Kristen Gil9-8
W#2 DoublesJohn Vasquez / Haley Tabor vs Gary Range / Elizabeth Everett6-2
W#3 DoublesMeredith Ware / David Bennett vs Doug Mauldin / Jill Simon8-1
2025-08-11vs 8.0 teamWon 30
W#1 DoublesConnor Dale / Sabra Carlton vs James Landess / Kristen Gil8-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Vasquez / Haley Tabor vs Gary Range / Elizabeth Everett9-8
W#3 DoublesMeredith Ware / David Bennett vs Doug Mauldin / Jill Simon8-3
2025-08-10vs 8.0 teamWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Goode / Megan Waagner vs James Landess / Jill Simon8-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Gutierrez / Beth Schaeffer vs Gary Range / Elizabeth Everett8-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Benjamin Gutierrez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Paul Goode
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Meredith Ware
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Beth Schaeffer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Connor Dale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Haley Tabor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John Vasquez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Waagner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sabra Carlton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Benjamin Gutierrez
8W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Paul Goode
10W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.09
Meredith Ware
10W–1L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
3.5
Beth Schaeffer
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Connor Dale
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Haley Tabor
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Vasquez
31W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Waagner
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sabra Carlton
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.