Teams

PD18/Beasley/BSH

2025 Adult Tri-Level 18 and over · 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.79 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-15vs PD18/Smith/FTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Strange / Candace Outlaw vs Ronelle van Heerden / Marlene Ward3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Crawford / Rachel Ingram vs Misty Lee / Brandi Davis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulia Rowland / Elizabeth Guttry vs Teresa Cheng / Skylar Jones6-3, 6-4
2025-08-06vs PD18/Wearing/FTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Webb / Julia Rowland vs Jessica Pittard / Robin Hanson6-1, 6-0
2025-07-15vs PD18/Smith/FTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesApril Crawley / April Jefferson vs Madison Rials / Laura Buen Abad2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaurin Gandy / Julia Rowland vs Misty Lee / Robin Downing6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Guttry / Mandy Phillips vs Rebecca Anderson / Teresa Cheng1-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs PD18/Wearing/FTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulia Rowland / Mandy Phillips vs Alison Aalerud / Summer Sibley1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnita Crawford / Nancy Huggins vs Celeste Wearing / Caitlin Kocherla6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesApril Crawley / Julie Strange vs Kristen Perkins / Stacie Watford6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-18vs PD18/Wearing/FTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulia Rowland / Jennifer Webb vs Melissa Boyer / Tamera King5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaurin Gandy / Emily Phillips vs Celeste Wearing / Alison Aalerud6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Strange / Nancy Huggins vs Lorraine Tindal / Robin Siegal6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-16vs PD18/Smith/FTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Phillips / Kellie Braddock vs Madison Rials / Laura Buen Abad2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Ingram / Anita Crawford vs Misty Lee / Brandi Davis2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Hubbard / Cecile Mary Lange vs Rebecca Anderson / Skylar Jones6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Kellie Braddock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Laurin Gandy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Rachel Ingram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Julie Strange
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
April Jefferson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Margaret Beasley
published
2.77
Candace Outlaw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
April Crawley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Nancy Huggins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Jenniffer Outlaw
published
2.46
Anita Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.36
Julia Rowland
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.26
Elizabeth Hubbard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Cecile Mary Lange
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Guttry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Mandy Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candace Outlaw + April Jefferson10853% games+4.0% vs expected
Candace Outlaw + Julie Strange9652% games+0.6% vs expected
April Crawley + Julie Strange3550% gamesnot enough data
April Jefferson + April Crawley123 matchesnot enough data
April Jefferson + Kellie Braddock123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kellie Braddock
15W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Laurin Gandy
29W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Rachel Ingram
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
Julie Strange
36W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
April Jefferson
16W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
Margaret Beasley
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Candace Outlaw
25W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
April Crawley
16W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Nancy Huggins
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Jenniffer Outlaw
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Anita Crawford
10W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Julia Rowland
9W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.36
2.5
Elizabeth Hubbard
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Cecile Mary Lange
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Elizabeth Guttry
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mandy Phillips
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.