Teams

Williams-Allen-CC

2026 CORTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-20vs Ha-CCLost 12
W#1 DoublesPearlie Jenkins / Tracey Olds vs Lissa Mummert / Jon Walburg6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Gibson / Kimberly Beck vs Crystal Wilson / Lynne Williamson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Mathis / Eunice Ampiaw vs Bobbi Starr / Cissy Sanders3-6, 4-6
2025-12-14vs Ezell-CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarlene Marshall / Kimberly Beck vs Sheila Ezell / Angela Drakeford4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Williams-Allen / Pat Majestic vs Missy Mizzell / Pam Knight2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMaureen Bolinger / Pearlie Jenkins vs Jenny Weekley / Lacy Swords6-3, 7-5
2025-12-11vs Teat-CCWon 21
L#1 DoublesTracey Olds / Kimberly Beck vs Ruthie Hite / Belinda Shively3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPearlie Jenkins / Maureen Bolinger vs Melodie Broderick / Pauline Marth6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPatricia Gibson / Lynne McLemore vs Janet Jenkins / Ruth Curtis6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-23vs Bunn/Galbraith-GIWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Williams-Allen / Pat Majestic vs Sue Goldman / Lisa Galbraith6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDarlene Marshall / Kimberly Beck vs Traci Courville / Louise Dillard6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPearlie Jenkins / Eunice Ampiaw vs Allison Coleman / Lloyd Pease0-6, 2-6
2025-11-20vs Ezell-CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Smith / Pearlie Jenkins vs Pam Knight / Kerri Medders2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Gibson / Kimberly Beck vs Sheila Ezell / Carla Hale3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Williams-Allen / Pat Majestic vs Paige King / Rene Roberts6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-11-16vs Teat-CCWon 21
L#1 DoublesPearlie Jenkins / Cheryl Williams-Allen vs Allison Johnson / Belinda Shively2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEunice Ampiaw / Lynne McLemore vs Cathy Jones / Joi Liscar6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatricia Gibson / Kimberly Beck vs Donna Akin / Ruth Curtis6-2, 6-3
2025-11-01vs Ha-CCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Williams-Allen / Pearlie Jenkins vs Crystal Wilson / Jeanene Wolf2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Mathis / Eunice Ampiaw vs Lynne Williamson / Yun Ha2-6, 4-6
2025-10-27vs Bunn/Galbraith-GIWon 20
W#1 DoublesPearlie Jenkins / Cheryl Williams-Allen vs Sherry Bunn / Elizabeth Borom6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Gibson / Kimberly Beck vs Allison Coleman / Lloyd Pease6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Darlene Marshall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Kimberly Beck
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.10
Maureen Bolinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Cheryl Williams-Allen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.97
Lynne McLemore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Pearlie Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Eunice Ampiaw
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Tracey Olds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Pat Majestic
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Mathis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Williams-Allen + Pat Majestic2641% games−6.0% vs expected
Tracey Olds + Darlene Marshall224 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Bolinger + Pearlie Jenkins314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Beck + Darlene Marshall224 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Williams-Allen + Pearlie Jenkins123 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Williams-Allen + Darlene Marshall213 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Olds + Pearlie Jenkins213 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Olds + Kimberly Beck033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darlene Marshall
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Kimberly Beck
13W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
3.12
Maureen Bolinger
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Cheryl Williams-Allen
12W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Lynne McLemore
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Pearlie Jenkins
44W–44L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Eunice Ampiaw
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.78
Tracey Olds
52W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.77
Pat Majestic
15W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.72
Lisa Mathis
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.