Teams

ACAC-Fields

2021 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-20vs SAL-SteinourLost 01
L#2 DoublesGail Cavallaro / John Delisio vs Lauren Cecil / Gregory Moore3-6, 3-6
2021-03-13vs RAIN-CamdenWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Delisio / Andrea Morrow vs Amy Scherer / James Gibson6-3, 6-4
2021-03-06vs MAC-TalamoWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Delisio / Tracey Watson vs Matt Talamo / Kasey Hammond6-4, 5-4
2021-02-27vs WW-PayneWon 20
W#1 DoublesMiguel Romero / Rebecca Wong vs Elizabeth West / George Brickley6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Delisio / Andrea Morrow vs Harry Turton / Holley Nilson6-4, 7-6
2021-02-21vs ACAC-WilsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Lutterbie / Tracey Watson vs Thomas Wilson / Erika Anderson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-01-30vs BURK-StewartWon 20
W#2 DoublesJohn Delisio / Andrea Morrow vs Gabrielle Davis / Mike Davis6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmir Tavassoli / Rebecca Wong vs Ingrid Kampinga / Steve Oliver6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Miguel Romero
published
3.69
Michelle Nelson
published
3.62
Andrea Morrow
published 4
3.51
Tracey Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Elham Tavassoli
published 3.5
3.34
Yasmin Lutterbie
published
3.23
John Delisio
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.17
Gail Cavallaro
published 3.5
3.13
Jenna DeLigio
published
3.07
Rebecca Wong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Kimberly Williams
published
2.89
Mark Lutterbie
published
2.77
George Drudge
published 3
William Fields
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Watson + John Delisio123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miguel Romero
29W–32L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.87
Michelle Nelson
12W–24L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Andrea Morrow
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Tracey Watson
135W–74L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Elham Tavassoli
59W–43L career · no lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.51
Yasmin Lutterbie
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
John Delisio
178W–167L career · 11 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Gail Cavallaro
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Jenna DeLigio
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Rebecca Wong
90W–101L career · 2 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
Kimberly Williams
17W–6L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
Mark Lutterbie
4W–14L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
George Drudge
10W–16L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
William Fields
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.