Teams

CLapointe (Marvin Creek); CAPS

2023-2024 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 3.5 Women; Daytime

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-01-12vs MSevigny (Carmel); Ball BustersLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Lapointe / Christina Waddell vs Mary Kate Watkins / Kathryn Klaus5-7, 3-6
2023-12-29vs JDerrico (BCC) Get SmashedWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Rosser / Melissa Habegger vs Julie Derrico / Dori Cazorla7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesMelissa Habegger / Caroline Lapointe vs Page Gatewood / Mandi Bell6-2, 6-0
2023-12-08vs NBrasch (PCC) Tennis AngelsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Rosser / Melissa Habegger vs Natasha Brasch / Tonja Padgett6-1, 6-1
2023-11-29vs DSchwede/CDewaele (Springfield)Won 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Lapointe / Christina Waddell vs CHRISTI DEWAELE / Debra Schwede6-4, 6-4
2023-11-15vs SDickson (WSRC) The Volley MamasWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Habegger / Christina Waddell vs Sally Dickson / Lisa Wilson7-5, 6-3
2023-11-10vs JThaker (Life Time); Team MATHOXWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Rosser / Christina Waddell vs Alison Oxendine / Kelli Massaro6-3, 6-2
2023-10-30vs MWebb (PCC) StepchildrenWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Lapointe / Melissa Habegger vs Maggie Webb / Kate Schumacher6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women; Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Melissa Habegger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Christina Waddell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Laurie Rosser
published
3.29
Caroline Lapointe
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Habegger + Laurie Rosser4455% games+7.4% vs expected
Melissa Habegger + Christina Waddell332753% games−0.2% vs expected
Melissa Habegger + Caroline Lapointe213 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Rosser + Caroline Lapointe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melissa Habegger
120W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Christina Waddell
84W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
Laurie Rosser
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.30
3.5
Caroline Lapointe
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.