Teams

Harlingen - Olga

2025 NA Valley Adult 18 & Over 2.5 W- 5.0 W - Fall · 2.5 Valley Ladies

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-01vs Mission - JoAnnLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Prado / Jane Gonzalez vs Veronica De La Fuente / Brenda Sandragorsian1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Kupish / Senovia Carolin Rodriguez vs Candi Ramirez / Janice Ponce0-6, 2-6
2025-10-21vs McAllen - Rocio/KerenWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Beale / Sadler Ward vs Keren Gonzalez / Claudia Ayala4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Prado vs Kristen Vela7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesOlga Moreno / Julieann Garza vs Rocio Guerra / Rosana Cendejas7-5, 6-1
2025-10-11vs Mission - JoAnnSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Beale / Sadler Ward vs Brenda Sandragorsian / Candi Ramirez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSenovia Carolin Rodriguez vs Sinem Demircan0-6, 1-6
2025-09-27vs Mission - JoAnnLost 02
L#1 SinglesChristine Perlino vs Sinem Demircan4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLaura Kupish / Jane Gonzalez vs Marla Cavazos / Veronica De La Fuente4-6, 2-6
2025-09-20vs McAllen - Rocio/KerenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesOlga Moreno / Amy Beale vs Keren Gonzalez / Claudia Ayala6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaura Kupish / Senovia Carolin Rodriguez vs Lauren Christy / Kristen Vela4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Valley Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mission - JoAnn5113514120
2McAllen - Rocio/Keren237818125
3Harlingen - Olga1441124162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Christine Perlino
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3
2.46
Olga Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.38
Sadler Ward
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.36
Jane Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Laura Prado
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Amy Beale
published 2.5
2.12
Senovia Carolin Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
2.05
Laura Kupish
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Olga Moreno + Christine Perlino123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christine Perlino
17W–23L career · 9 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
Olga Moreno
7W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
Sadler Ward
8W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Jane Gonzalez
1W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Laura Prado
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Amy Beale
no matches on record · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Senovia Carolin Rodriguez
4W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Laura Kupish
1W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.