Teams

KY/LOU/DICKS

2023 Tri-Level 18 & over Mixed Doubles · Mixed 7.0, 7.5, 8.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-08-20vs WeinaLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Steen / Christopher Mohr vs Nina Weina / Doug Velander4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Mary Grace Amato
published
3.65
Patrick Burnett
published
3.45
Kellee Dicks
published
3.38
Ronette Brumfield
published
3.37
Christopher Mohr
published 3.5
3.32
Jae Neumann
published 3.5
3.23
Daniel Meador
published 3.5
3.20
Lisa Steen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
2.94
Emily Nolan
published 3.5
2.83
Patrick Wissing
published
2.77
Kyra Frederick
published
2.69
Stephanie Kellerman
published
Jeffrey Bayers
published
Ken Stovall
published
Mark McAllister
published
Michael Wasson
published
Tracy Jesse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kyra Frederick + Patrick Wissing4441% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Kellerman + Daniel Meador3255% gamesnot enough data
Ronette Brumfield + Daniel Meador134 matchesnot enough data
Michael Wasson + Kellee Dicks033 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Bayers + Kellee Dicks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Grace Amato
47W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
3.94
Patrick Burnett
44W–80L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
Kellee Dicks
49W–77L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.45
Ronette Brumfield
41W–49L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Christopher Mohr
29W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Jae Neumann
14W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Daniel Meador
11W–19L career · type S · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Lisa Steen
173W–163L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Catherine Birchfield
26W–51L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Emily Nolan
30W–71L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
Patrick Wissing
52W–52L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
Kyra Frederick
22W–39L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Stephanie Kellerman
68W–84L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Jeffrey Bayers
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ken Stovall
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark McAllister
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Wasson
24W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Jesse
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.