Teams

LKHA-Haynes/CSD-WP 18s 8.5 Wed pm

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 8.5 Men Wed PM 18s

14 players · average NTRP 4.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-15vs LVSA-Sampoornam/NMPWon 10
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Keeney / Austin Miller vs Jordan Paterra / Aleksandr Lvovich6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-08vs LJBA-Banner/CSD 18+Combo8.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Keeney / Austin Miller vs Marc Subin / Jeffrey Steed6-3, 6-1
2025-09-24vs LVSA-Sampoornam/NMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Keeney / Austin Miller vs Adam Colborne / Jon Schrand6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-17vs LJBA-Banner/CSD 18+Combo8.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesMiguel Monguilod / Benjamin Keeney vs Babak Shoja / Derek Buchanan6-2, 6-1
2025-09-03vs LVSA-Sampoornam/NMPWon 10
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Keeney / Miguel Monguilod vs Joe Wolff / Venkatesh Sampoornam6-2, 6-2
2025-08-27vs LJBA-Banner/CSD 18+Combo8.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMicah Robbins / Austin Miller vs LUIS AYALA / Babak Shoja4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men Wed PM 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Otto Vejsada
published
4.40
Steven Kayton
published
4.40
Jason Woodsby
published
4.38
Andres Pazos
published 5
4.30
Alex Orr
published 4.5
4.27
Benjamin Keeney
published 4.5
4.12
Michael Dedmond
published
4.05
Micah Robbins
published
4.03
Miguel Monguilod
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.92
Alex Carver
published 4
3.88
Austin Miller
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Thomas Andrews
published
3.73
Andrew Potts
published 4
Ryan Poage
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Kayton + Thomas Andrews314 matchesnot enough data
Austin Miller + Micah Robbins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Otto Vejsada
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
4.47
Steven Kayton
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
Jason Woodsby
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.40
5
Andres Pazos
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
4.38
4.5
Alex Orr
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Benjamin Keeney
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
Michael Dedmond
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.12
Micah Robbins
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Miguel Monguilod
89W–47L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Alex Carver
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Austin Miller
119W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.88
Thomas Andrews
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Andrew Potts
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Ryan Poage
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.