Teams

TING.Chandrapraksh

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-24Won 20
W#1 SinglesRajshekar Chandraprakash vs Rui Li6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesParikshith Chada vs Yi Chen4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-11-17vs MCP.PanthriWon 20
W#1 SinglesParikshith Chada vs Alay Patel6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRavi Verma vs Anish Arya6-1, 6-3
2025-11-13vs TOC.BeesonWon 21
L#1 SinglesAshok Babu Raparla vs Stuart Beeson1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRavi Verma vs Alex Soyars6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesParikshith Chada vs Nick Mello6-0, 6-0
2025-11-10vs TOC.ByrneWon 20
W#2 SinglesRavi Verma vs Cameron Leggett6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesParikshith Chada vs Brian Jones6-1, 6-1
2025-10-22vs MCP.PanthriLost 03
L#1 SinglesRajshekar Chandraprakash vs Vidit Desai1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesParikshith Chada vs Rajiv Nair7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesRavi Verma vs Alay Patel6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-21vs TOC.KochkinSplit 11
W#2 SinglesRavi Verma vs Michael Mazyar6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesAshok Babu Raparla vs Aleksei Saibel3-6, 6-7
2025-10-13vs TOC.BowmanWon 10
W#1 SinglesParikshith Chada vs Steve Bowman6-2, 6-3
2025-10-06vs TOC.TaoWon 21
W#1 SinglesParikshith Chada vs Qi Zhang6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRavi Verma vs Matthew Stewart6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesAshok Babu Raparla vs Yi Chen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Rajshekar Chandraprakash
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Vivek Singh
published
3.37
Ravi Verma
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.36
Parikshith Chada
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.27
Ashok Babu Raparla
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Rahul Nahire
published
Sri Ram
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rajshekar Chandraprakash + Ashok Babu Raparla161055% games+0.7% vs expected
Ravi Verma + Parikshith Chada224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rajshekar Chandraprakash
76W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Vivek Singh
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Ravi Verma
35W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Parikshith Chada
37W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Ashok Babu Raparla
37W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Rahul Nahire
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sri Ram
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.