Teams

EFSC - Brunkala

2025 Brevard Combo 18 & Over - Women's Summer · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-10vs Kiwi - WyandWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanine Brunkala / Julia Tulloch vs Tracey Draper / Lisa Zizzo7-5, 6-1
2025-07-03vs RCCB - McelweeWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Failla / Julia Tulloch vs Mary Hoyt / Penny MacDonald6-0, 6-1
2025-06-26vs Brevard/Love/Combo18&Over6.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanine Brunkala / Julianne Moore vs Stacy Williams / Kerry Sutton6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Dwyer / Angila Burke vs Jennifer Lacey / Sonja Waterman2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTerri Dillon / Dawn Green vs Jennifer Mitz / Leslie Love2-6, 1-6
2025-06-12vs RCCB - VickersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanine Brunkala / Julia Tulloch vs Erin Schlitts / LANEY CARDWELL4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-05vs Suntree - LyonsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kriete / Angila Burke vs Jill Lyons / Daryl Davenport6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmily Dwyer / Julianne Moore vs Janice Waltmeyer / Frances Halley6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Failla / Shelly Deater vs Jennifer Murtha / Kathryn Nitti6-3, 6-3
2025-05-29vs Kiwanis - PressLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Failla / Julia Tulloch vs Michelle Winterich / DeAnna Nolting0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Mary Failla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Janine Brunkala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Dawn Green
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Julia Tulloch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Julianne Moore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Shelly Deater
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Angila Burke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Emily Dwyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Kriete
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Meredith Christie
published
Terri Dillon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julianne Moore + Angila Burke6159% games+10.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Failla
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Janine Brunkala
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Dawn Green
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Julia Tulloch
97W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Julianne Moore
18W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Shelly Deater
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Angila Burke
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Emily Dwyer
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Kriete
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Meredith Christie
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri Dillon
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.